The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City'.
whatif the PCJ could drive on water?!what would it look like?!what if dodo worked on it?!that would be cool,a flying drive-by!
Page:
Robin wrote:
> Meh, leave the just arrived alone, we all made mistakes the first time
> we got here...
Pft, I never produced any of the crap n00bs do now, no, it wasn't like this in my day!
> Meh, leave the just arrived alone, we all made mistakes the first time
> we got here...
Pft, I never produced any of the crap n00bs do now, no, it wasn't like this in my day!
hopefully you'll agree that the game would be better with tranquilizers,Memorandum.
Memorandum wrote:
> You spelt "Giraffe" wrong too, by the way.
Meh, i dont care, im not too good at spelling as you may of noticed...
> You spelt "Giraffe" wrong too, by the way.
Meh, i dont care, im not too good at spelling as you may of noticed...
The first thing they should add are better controls, to engance the gameplay.
ie. the ability to strafe, it would make it alot easier to shoot and move at the same time, by giving you the ability to circle around enemies.
I suppose thats really down to the inadequecies of the PS2 controller really...
ie. the ability to strafe, it would make it alot easier to shoot and move at the same time, by giving you the ability to circle around enemies.
I suppose thats really down to the inadequecies of the PS2 controller really...
so what, are you 60 memorandum?
Robin wrote:
> Memorandum wrote:
> You spelt "Giraffe" wrong too, by the way.
>
> Meh, i dont care, im not too good at spelling as you may of noticed...
I was talking to him, about his name, yours was spelt the same way as his name, and you were referring to him, which means that yours is in fact, spelt correctly, as you were referring to him.
> Memorandum wrote:
> You spelt "Giraffe" wrong too, by the way.
>
> Meh, i dont care, im not too good at spelling as you may of noticed...
I was talking to him, about his name, yours was spelt the same way as his name, and you were referring to him, which means that yours is in fact, spelt correctly, as you were referring to him.
Girraffe22 wrote:
> so what, are you 60 memorandum?
No, I'm 15, and that sentence should have read:
So Memorandum, what are you? Sixty?
Unless of course I've interpreted it wrong and you weren't trying to imply I was sixty years of age.
> so what, are you 60 memorandum?
No, I'm 15, and that sentence should have read:
So Memorandum, what are you? Sixty?
Unless of course I've interpreted it wrong and you weren't trying to imply I was sixty years of age.
oh no!we have @%*#in grammer patrol!!Run!
how come they'er are'nt more traffic color cheats?!i want blue!!!
YeY n00b!
Leave him be, he's only trying to fit in.
Leave him be, he's only trying to fit in.
Page: