The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
-MGS:Substance-looks impressive but like MGS2 too much I think. Nothing new
-Splinter Cell-looks brilliant but the playable demo isn't all that.
-Devil May Cry 2-looks fun to play but is said to be worst than the first.
Please reply with your views. Thanks!
pring
I decided that after a few reviews stating that DMC2 was a real let down after the original, that I would stick with my old copy of DMC and not worry about new stuff.
Splinter Cell really didn't look that great to me. I thought that the way the main character moved looked fairly unrealistic, not sure why, but it just had that "this is a puppet show" feel to it. Besides, I`d go for Metal Gear over this any day.
But... perhaps not Metal Gear Substance. If I had gone for one of the three, it would have been this, but only just. The new VR missions would have been just enough to tempt me over the other two, but not enough to make me buy it.
As a result... didn`t go for any of them, and looked back in time a little to see what I`d missed during my exams, and found Kingdom Hearts.
> Think man, Splinter Cell rocks, the graphics are off the scale and the
> gameplay never gets tedious or boring.
Have you actually played Splinter Cell?? The graphics are good, but it's slow, unwealdy and dull.
i bought the full game nonetheless and it is a lot funner and more challenging
i recommend splinter cell
MGS: Substance - Looks and sounds too much like SOL.
Splinter Cell - Cant comment really, never played it and not seen any media.
DMC2 - I have it, and it rules.
> Sorry if i annoyed or offended anyone
you didn't offend me I was just saying that a wouldn't be able to afford all three at once. Might be able to persuade my parents to buy me one of them though!! :D