Viewing Thread:
"War With Iraq. Yes, No or Where is the monkey?"

Question:- should we goto war with iraq?

answer one :- YES

answer two :- No

Answer three :- where is the monkey? (whitehouse)

(please note i know there are shades of yessness and noness but if we go in that direction it will be boring)

Anyway. I say Yes

Id like to see reasons for no though. every day its more people whining on about how bad war with iraq qould be. Well in my opinion if war removed saddam then its pretty good.

So anti war people post reasons NOT to goto war.

And for once (this is adressed to various people. you know who you are) lets keep this thread on topic. this is vaguallr serious (except the bit involving the monkey)

There will not be a 'war'.

A war is two whole countries fighting against each other.
A war is millions of deaths.
A war happens when people do bad things.

There is no 'war'

All this is, at most, is a one-man hit.
Iraq has a laughable amount of people willing to put their lives down for Saddam. Not enough for a war.

This is a one-objective operation, to stop Saddam firing his missiles at people.
The missiles which he agreed not to have all those years ago.
He is breaking the law he agreed to uphold.

Therefore, he needs to be dealt with .
It's simple - someone breaks the law, you sort them out.

This is not a war.

Robin wrote:
> I think that we should go to war and end this thing once and for all,
> befor they get bigger more powerfull bombs...

You honestly think a war would end all this once and for all. It didn't exactly work that way 12 years ago, did it? So, what makes things so different this time round?

I think that we should go to war and end this thing once and for all, befor they get bigger more powerfull bombs...

My opinion is that the US anthrax things were internal. Some american nutcase who wanted to cause trouble.

I actually hope american commanders don't leave the british troops behind. Problem is america wants all the glory. So they will ignore their allies which would be a VERY bad decision. IF its joint equal use of both american and english troops it will be much better. I think so anyway.

heh @ BEARDS

The monkey represents sharing.

Semajal wrote:
> Britain + America only 2 countries actually doing anything to make the
> world a better place in the future.
>
> My opinion anyway.


and when america gets fatter, it will be only us :D

*note to all americans, and american lovers... i will be in long gone by the time youuve read this message, so dont bother getting the guns out :P*

You can't go to war against one person. They are at war with his regime, they don't try to target innocent people.

Insane Bartender wrote:
> Giving the Palestinians their own state is, to me, a simple affair.
>
> Give them Palestine as it was before 1948.

I'll agree with Insane Bartender there.

And why bomb Iraq?! Why do we want to go to war against Iraq?! Why Iraq?! Why not Saddam Hussein?! Why not bomb Saddam Hussein instead of Iraq?! Its Saddam Hussein, the evil heartless dictator we want to get, not Iraq, a poor country which is being ruled under an evil regime (Or whatever that word is, which means cruel goverment or something).

It couldn't be any more simpler than it is. All the bloodshed on that front is down to them being promised they'd once again have their own state and then never following it through.

Giving the Palestinians their own state is, to me, a simple affair.

Give them Palestine as it was before 1948.