Viewing Thread:
"A puzzle for yous all..."

My first is in biscuit but never in cake
My second's in awesome but not in great
My third is in mother but not seen in dad
My fourth is in sunny but never in sad
My fifth is a vowel found in water not creek
My sixth is found only in one day of the week
My seventh's two of three that you learn when you're young
My eighth's not in song but it's there when it's sung
My ninth's in eleven and twelve, not thirteen
My tenth is in island and river, not stream
My eleventh's in precious and secret and paste
My twelfth is in phantom and spectre and haste
My whole stalks the night in a quiet dreamlike state
With no memories the next day of being out late

Ineedsleep wrote:
> Did Mary kill Sarah's husband
>
> Or her (Mary) own

Sarahs

Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> Double Jeopardy? (sp?)
>
> The conclusive prove was brought to light after Mary had already been
> tried for the killing.
>
> She got off the first time and couldn't be tried twice?

I think you might have it there

Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> Double Jeopardy? (sp?)
>
> The conclusive prove was brought to light after Mary had already been
> tried for the killing.
>
> She got off the first time and couldn't be tried twice?

No

but I like it

Did Mary kill Sarah's husband

Or her (Mary) own

Drunk Cow wrote:
> Did I get it right.....

you haven't solved it yet

Double Jeopardy? (sp?)

The conclusive prove was brought to light after Mary had already been tried for the killing.

She got off the first time and couldn't be tried twice?

Did I get it right.....

Simon Says wrote:
> Rosalind wrote:
> Sarah could prove beyond a doubt that Mary was her husbands killer,
> but Mary was never brought to justice. Why?
>
>
> Was the killing not actually murder?

It was murder

Slaveunit wrote:
> regardless of wether sarah could prove it, was mary the killer?

yes

Drunk Cow wrote:
> Did Mary and Sarah look alike so Sarah got framed for it instead.

no
>
>
> They were twins weren't they.

yes