The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Play games like me - play maybe one or two hours at a time, put it down and come back to it another time. It lasts longer and keeps the experience fresh. I still haven't completed Onimusha, ZOE or Devil May Cry and they are all 'short' games. Monkeys.
Am i right...?
> Reload wrote:
> I only play games for ages if it's really good, never when
> it's crap.
Crap,
> short games suck!
So your saying crap games are
> crap?
Is he not saying Crap Short Gmes are crap?
Crap long games rock! :)
> Just don't sit in front of a tele for hours on end. It's bad for your eyes,
> posture and street cred.
Street Cred! .... lol... ood stuff! :) ... I havnt heard that since the eighties :)
> I only play games for ages if it's really good, never when it's crap.
Crap,
> short games suck!
So your saying crap games are crap?
> But if it's a good game, it gets you hooked so you can't stop playing.
Exactly Conker was way too short because it was so compelling to complete! But mulitplayer that is the key to length Conker lasted 3 months + for me due to the multiplayer i still play it on and off now (and i got it 10 months ago).
Goldeneye and Perfect Dark prime examples!
Crap, short games suck!
> Surely the telling point for a great game is that once you start playing it, you can't let it go. Hence we finish better games faster. A truly great game is one that pulls you in for hours on end and still takes ages to complete.
Take Super Metroid or Zelda Ocarina of Time for example...
I have the habit of sitting down with a game for hours on end until it is done.
I did this recently with a copy (rented copy thank god) of james Bond AUF and completed it in one night (on easy mode).... after that I lost interest....
Actually, I could play GTA3 for months. Trouble is when I hit the outside world I might get confused.