The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Ever since I registered for ukchatforums I have been persecuted for some inane reason. Why? Partially beacause I am a newbie, so get relentliously picked on by 'big' regulars.
News Flash......
YOU ARE NOT SO HIGH AND MIGHTY PUNKS!!!
Most of you (sorry for the exceptions)are just sad immmature bullies.
There, I said it.
The next time you pick on a 'just arrived' or a 'newbie' (yep, I'm looking at you Stryke) remeber that they are probably geting used to your way of doing things. I know that most spammers are newbies (and they deserve to be banned/shot/castrated), but some (me in particular) post long and detailed articles. Still, I am being hailed as a cheater just because I used long words like libellous.
The next time you are about to smash a newbies hopes and dreams remember.
It's CHRISTMAS!
Thank you,
o(^_^)o
News Flash......
YOU ARE NOT SO HIGH AND MIGHTY PUNKS!!!
Most of you (sorry for the exceptions)are just sad immmature bullies.
There, I said it.
The next time you pick on a 'just arrived' or a 'newbie' (yep, I'm looking at you Stryke) remeber that they are probably geting used to your way of doing things. I know that most spammers are newbies (and they deserve to be banned/shot/castrated), but some (me in particular) post long and detailed articles. Still, I am being hailed as a cheater just because I used long words like libellous.
The next time you are about to smash a newbies hopes and dreams remember.
It's CHRISTMAS!
Thank you,
o(^_^)o
Page:
Joe@SpecialReserve wrote:
I've already found at least 3 of your topics to be lifted straight from
> other sites. You may notice they have now been removed. So you're going
> slightly the wrong way about proving your point.
What sites would they be then?
I've already found at least 3 of your topics to be lifted straight from
> other sites. You may notice they have now been removed. So you're going
> slightly the wrong way about proving your point.
What sites would they be then?
AH! Knew I was right. The reviews by Bourneo looked suspicious.
Joe@SpecialReserve wrote:
So you're going
> slightly the wrong way about proving your point.
Gah, you're just doing the Italics to annoy us. IU still think it's unfair that only Staffies can use HTML...
So you're going
> slightly the wrong way about proving your point.
Gah, you're just doing the Italics to annoy us. IU still think it's unfair that only Staffies can use HTML...
o(^_^)o wrote:
In some
> of my posts that I wrote (in the Future of Gaming - Chat forums) I was suspected
> of cheating just because they were long with good grammar and vocabulary. I
> wanted to make a point out of this so that other people who write good posts
> aren't criticised as I was.
I've already found at least 3 of your topics to be lifted straight from other sites. You may notice they have now been removed. So you're going slightly the wrong way about proving your point.
In some
> of my posts that I wrote (in the Future of Gaming - Chat forums) I was suspected
> of cheating just because they were long with good grammar and vocabulary. I
> wanted to make a point out of this so that other people who write good posts
> aren't criticised as I was.
I've already found at least 3 of your topics to be lifted straight from other sites. You may notice they have now been removed. So you're going slightly the wrong way about proving your point.
Newbies are normaly picked on for a reason and that reason normaly is there talking trash.
I've only ever been flamed on a post mainly cause i made a bad point (it was in the DC forum) i started a post that i thought was a good argument but reading later was a single minded and a lame point of view which i myself disagreed with later on.
now i learned my lesson pretty quickly.
I've only ever been flamed on a post mainly cause i made a bad point (it was in the DC forum) i started a post that i thought was a good argument but reading later was a single minded and a lame point of view which i myself disagreed with later on.
now i learned my lesson pretty quickly.
Rob007 wrote:
Well I cant say that Stryke has abused me in anyway (the only person that hasnt!)
Don't temp him....
Well I cant say that Stryke has abused me in anyway (the only person that hasnt!)
Don't temp him....
Too true. I would like to apoligise if I have done any of the things you stated, and I didn't intentionaly mean to start a 'newbie uprising'.
In some of my posts that I wrote (in the Future of Gaming - Chat forums) I was suspected of cheating just because they were long with good grammar and vocabulary. I wanted to make a point out of this so that other people who write good posts aren't criticised as I was.
*Please note, not all Regulars and Notables are paranoid freaks; just a select bunch*.
In some of my posts that I wrote (in the Future of Gaming - Chat forums) I was suspected of cheating just because they were long with good grammar and vocabulary. I wanted to make a point out of this so that other people who write good posts aren't criticised as I was.
*Please note, not all Regulars and Notables are paranoid freaks; just a select bunch*.
God... Every once in a while their is a "Newbie Uprising".
If you really want to know why Regulars and Notables ahem "Pick" on you, then I'll tell you.
In general, JATS and Newbies tend to be a bunch of illiterate, stuck up, annoying, cheating, spamming, ridiculous unsulting pieces of dog excrement. And that's not an opinion, that is A FACT.
Most newbies and JATS spam, spk in txt spk, and post the most compelte tosh I've seen since vows of fidelity were included in the French marriage service.
And what they do worst and what annoys Regs and Notables the MOST, is when the accuse them of being "Aloof". That is the biggest pile of bull---- I've ever heard.
Regs and Notables don't do anything to JATS and Newbies unless they are provoked. And the thing that provokes them most is being accused of acting aloof and JATS and Newbies being cocky.
If you think this is bad, you should see other boards. On ohter boards n00bs are ignored, really badly abused and are nearly always given the cold shoulder. On one board there was a Kill The n00bs Campaign. Every single n00b was ignored, abused and generally been nasty too.
It's nothing like that here, and the only reason JATS and Newbies think it is is because, most of the time, not all, the JATS and Newbies are a bunch of ash holes.
And now I have no doubt at all that I am going to get accused of being aloof and shouted at for being nasty to Newbies.
If you really want to know why Regulars and Notables ahem "Pick" on you, then I'll tell you.
In general, JATS and Newbies tend to be a bunch of illiterate, stuck up, annoying, cheating, spamming, ridiculous unsulting pieces of dog excrement. And that's not an opinion, that is A FACT.
Most newbies and JATS spam, spk in txt spk, and post the most compelte tosh I've seen since vows of fidelity were included in the French marriage service.
And what they do worst and what annoys Regs and Notables the MOST, is when the accuse them of being "Aloof". That is the biggest pile of bull---- I've ever heard.
Regs and Notables don't do anything to JATS and Newbies unless they are provoked. And the thing that provokes them most is being accused of acting aloof and JATS and Newbies being cocky.
If you think this is bad, you should see other boards. On ohter boards n00bs are ignored, really badly abused and are nearly always given the cold shoulder. On one board there was a Kill The n00bs Campaign. Every single n00b was ignored, abused and generally been nasty too.
It's nothing like that here, and the only reason JATS and Newbies think it is is because, most of the time, not all, the JATS and Newbies are a bunch of ash holes.
And now I have no doubt at all that I am going to get accused of being aloof and shouted at for being nasty to Newbies.
Wrambo wrote:
> Stryke wrote:
> Oh, you're that Bourneo type thing. Yes, I do reckon you are
> cheating.
Takes one to know one Strykey
You accuse me of cheating? That's hilarious. Everyone that I regard as alright would never accuse me of cheating as they know what kind of writer I am.
> Stryke wrote:
> Oh, you're that Bourneo type thing. Yes, I do reckon you are
> cheating.
Takes one to know one Strykey
You accuse me of cheating? That's hilarious. Everyone that I regard as alright would never accuse me of cheating as they know what kind of writer I am.
Page: