The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just bought OPSM2 on my lunch break, was playing J&D demo when it suddenly crashed.
I was just moving the camera as I walked Jak about, and the PS2 seized up and the screen went blank. Shame, it was looking like a good game as well.
Very strange. Haven't got time to try it again, have to get back to work.
Also, who was it that was saying that the XBox will crash as it's just a PC?
Looks like the PS2 may be more PC like than you'd like to admit....
I was just moving the camera as I walked Jak about, and the PS2 seized up and the screen went blank. Shame, it was looking like a good game as well.
Very strange. Haven't got time to try it again, have to get back to work.
Also, who was it that was saying that the XBox will crash as it's just a PC?
Looks like the PS2 may be more PC like than you'd like to admit....
Page:
Your Honour wrote:
> Also, who was it that was saying that the XBox will crash as it's just
> a PC?
Looks like the PS2 may be more PC like than you'd like to admit....
MM lets see... Nvida graphics card, Pentium 3 processor... Nope X-Box is definately more PC than a PS2!!
> Also, who was it that was saying that the XBox will crash as it's just
> a PC?
Looks like the PS2 may be more PC like than you'd like to admit....
MM lets see... Nvida graphics card, Pentium 3 processor... Nope X-Box is definately more PC than a PS2!!
Thankfully it was only the Demo or we would be in real trouble, all though occasionally my mates PS2 has crashed during play but that is very rare to happen but it has happened.
FatButcher wrote:
> will wrote:
> does any one know cheats for 007 agent under fire
we've
> already seen you request
no
I said it before you.....see
i think were (maybe me) are being silly now
> will wrote:
> does any one know cheats for 007 agent under fire
we've
> already seen you request
no
I said it before you.....see
i think were (maybe me) are being silly now
FatButcher wrote:
> Thats what I said
Yeah, but you said it while I was typing it - and you weren't as polite. (No change there, then! :-)
> Thats what I said
Yeah, but you said it while I was typing it - and you weren't as polite. (No change there, then! :-)
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> will wrote:
> does any one know cheats for 007 agent under fire
Will,
> with respect, there's no need to post this in every thread - if anyone has
> cheats, they will post them in the thread you created.
Posting it everywhere
> won't get you the cheats any faster, and will only serve to make people annoyed
> at you, and we don't want that, do we.
Thats what I said
> will wrote:
> does any one know cheats for 007 agent under fire
Will,
> with respect, there's no need to post this in every thread - if anyone has
> cheats, they will post them in the thread you created.
Posting it everywhere
> won't get you the cheats any faster, and will only serve to make people annoyed
> at you, and we don't want that, do we.
Thats what I said
will wrote:
> does any one know cheats for 007 agent under fire
Will, with respect, there's no need to post this in every thread - if anyone has cheats, they will post them in the thread you created.
Posting it everywhere won't get you the cheats any faster, and will only serve to make people annoyed at you, and we don't want that, do we.
> does any one know cheats for 007 agent under fire
Will, with respect, there's no need to post this in every thread - if anyone has cheats, they will post them in the thread you created.
Posting it everywhere won't get you the cheats any faster, and will only serve to make people annoyed at you, and we don't want that, do we.
will wrote:
> does any one know cheats for 007 agent under fire
we've already seen you request
no
> does any one know cheats for 007 agent under fire
we've already seen you request
no
Your Honour wrote:
> I didn't read the mag, just chucked the DVD in and away I went.
I dunno... ignorant as usual! ;-)
> That's a weird way of giving out a demo though, surely?
It's bloody annoying, I'll grant you that - but most of the developers seem to be doing it lately.
The GT3 demo gave you enough time for 2 laps, then went on to the replay.
The FIFA & TIF demos only let you play one half of the match.
J & D times out to a blank, black screen.
And there are several others too. I find it extremely annoying, and I was *very* happy when I found out that there were no limits on the Dropship demo - just the training levels and one full mission.
> I didn't read the mag, just chucked the DVD in and away I went.
I dunno... ignorant as usual! ;-)
> That's a weird way of giving out a demo though, surely?
It's bloody annoying, I'll grant you that - but most of the developers seem to be doing it lately.
The GT3 demo gave you enough time for 2 laps, then went on to the replay.
The FIFA & TIF demos only let you play one half of the match.
J & D times out to a blank, black screen.
And there are several others too. I find it extremely annoying, and I was *very* happy when I found out that there were no limits on the Dropship demo - just the training levels and one full mission.
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> I don't think so!
If you read the small print in the mag, you'll see that the
> demo times out after 10 minutes and you have to reset the console! :-)
Ah! I see.
I didn't read the mag, just chucked the DVD in and away I went.
It did say on the screen to reset the console after the game, but I didn't realise it timed out.
That's a weird way of giving out a demo though, surely? I would have thought that it would be better to give the whole of the first level, or something.
Anyway, my mistake. Sorry all!
> I don't think so!
If you read the small print in the mag, you'll see that the
> demo times out after 10 minutes and you have to reset the console! :-)
Ah! I see.
I didn't read the mag, just chucked the DVD in and away I went.
It did say on the screen to reset the console after the game, but I didn't realise it timed out.
That's a weird way of giving out a demo though, surely? I would have thought that it would be better to give the whole of the first level, or something.
Anyway, my mistake. Sorry all!
Page: