The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Click Here
"A judge at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court refused bail because of the risk of the 39-year-old fleeing."
"Julian Assange surrendered himself to police in London"
Thoughts?
"A judge at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court refused bail because of the risk of the 39-year-old fleeing."
"Julian Assange surrendered himself to police in London"
Thoughts?
Page:
I heard the lawyer for Julien Assange speaking on Radio 5 yesterday - apparently the US were given the opportunity to review all information prior to publication and make any 'redactions' they deemed necessary but chose not to.
Doesn't really give the impression the content is that important, or poses that much of a risk to national security....
Doesn't really give the impression the content is that important, or poses that much of a risk to national security....
Nin wrote:
Alfonse wrote:
[i]Justifiable if the exposed material really does compromise national security?
There's been absolutely nothing to suggest national security has been compromised so far. All publicly released documents have been edited.
Do you feel that any of the information is being reckless distributed though? There were claims that Afghan civilians known to have collaborated with NATO forces had their details published online.
Alfonse wrote:
[i]Justifiable if the exposed material really does compromise national security?
There's been absolutely nothing to suggest national security has been compromised so far. All publicly released documents have been edited.
Do you feel that any of the information is being reckless distributed though? There were claims that Afghan civilians known to have collaborated with NATO forces had their details published online.
Alfonse wrote:
Justifiable if the exposed material really does compromise national security?
There's been absolutely nothing to suggest national security has been compromised so far. All publicly released documents have been edited.
The US government would be better served by plugging their security and working out why their employees are giving away information instead of hunting journalists.
Justifiable if the exposed material really does compromise national security?
There's been absolutely nothing to suggest national security has been compromised so far. All publicly released documents have been edited.
The US government would be better served by plugging their security and working out why their employees are giving away information instead of hunting journalists.
Justifiable if the exposed material really does compromise national security?
Democracy and freedom of the press has been exposed as an illusion. You mess with the big boys and this is how long it takes them to drop their "principles".
Click Here
"A judge at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court refused bail because of the risk of the 39-year-old fleeing."
"Julian Assange surrendered himself to police in London"
Thoughts?
"A judge at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court refused bail because of the risk of the 39-year-old fleeing."
"Julian Assange surrendered himself to police in London"
Thoughts?
Page: