The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
To make a truly great film, what do you need? I’ve heard many arguments on this, and there’s always going to be debate. But I think I’ve narrowed it down to certain areas. So, without further ado, let’s proceed.
SPECIAL EFFECTS
Ah, that most controversial and magnificent of areas. I’ve seen plenty of films where bigger and better special effects have ruined what could have been a superb idea. The Mummy Returns is probably the best example. They GCI of the Scorpion King at the end just let it down, and I found myself thinking that it couldn’t hold a candle to The Mummy. Special Effects can cause a movie to forget about other more important areas, such as plot and screenplay. However, if produced in union with these areas, special effects can make a movie live in our memories. Think about films with huge breakthroughs in special effects – Star Wars, Alien, Jurassic Park, The Matrix. These films are pure legends. But is it just because of their special effects? I don’t think so. All these films had great acting and plot. The special effects added to the atmosphere, that is true, but it was just the icing on the cake. I’m afraid that CGI aren’t all they are cracked up to be, although they do bring in the crowds. You could argue that special effects make a successful film, but since when had successful meant great?
ACTING
The visible face of the film. A great actor can carry a film on his shoulders and still give the performance of a lifetime, lifting those around him. Without doubt the most crucial part to a film. A well known motto of film critics is that ‘a great actor should rise about his material’ – basically saying that even if the plot is dire, the film should be good because the actor carries it. Modern myth, or jaded truth? I’d say truth, but only to an extent. Although a truly great actor can carry a film even with a dire plot, it will never be great. Take Gladiator. This film had one of the greatest plots ever, yet I’d bet that without an actor of the calibre of Russell Crowe, it wouldn’t have been saluted as a great. He made that film his own, but only through a symbiotic relationship with the scriptwriters. He gave the plot the representation it deserved, and the plot made him able to show his ability. In all honesty, a great film needs great actors, but there have been exceptions. Look at Star Wars, with Mark Hamill as the lead character, Luke Skywalker. He, without argument, starred in one of the greatest films ever. Channel 4’s Top 100 Film List rated Star Wars: A New Hope/The Empire Strikes Back the top films of all time. Yet you could hardly call Hamill a Hollywood legend. There were others in the film that are some of the film worlds finest – Harrison Ford and Alec Guiness. However, the film is a great film even without a memorable lead actor. So, onwards..
PLOT
Without a good plot, a film is doomed to failure. It’s as simple as that. The plot is what captivates the viewer, controls how we watch the film. Some films have a plot automatically set out for them – these are the book based films – Pelican Brief, Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, Lord of the Rings. All these have great plots, but the problem with books is that a book rarely appeals to everyone. You’ve got fantasy fans who will go to see Lord of the Rings, thriller fans who went to see Silence of the Lambs, and so on. But a truly great plot is written solely for the film, not adapted or taken from elsewhere. This is an argumentative view, but hey, that’s me. George Lucas didn’t take the plot for Star Wars from a book, he created that piece of magic for himself. I think that deserves more credit than to someone who adapted a book. Plot is one of the most important areas, for without it all else in the film will fail. Enough said.
MUSIC
One of the most overlooked, and therefore crucial parts to a film. I wonder how many people sit on the edge of their seats during a particularly gripping scene, or feel their blood rise during a chase, without realising it is the music that is creating the atmosphere? The classic example has to be Jaws. Without the famous John Williams beat to the approaching shark, the film would never have been so gripping. The anticipation that was generated as the music slowly grew faster and faster… You knew what was going to happen, and you wanted it to happen. What a great feeling that was. Another great scene – Maximus charged through the trees in the opening sequence of Gladiator, backed by the Roman cavalry, all screaming ROMA VICTOR!, to the backdrop of another stroke of brilliance from John Williams. I don’t think there will ever be another film moment quite like that. I have always thought that music is what makes a film memorable. Not great, but memorable.
I think everything except special effects is needed. Oh, a great film may be helped on it’s way by special effects, and they can greatly enhance the atmosphere in the cinema, but they aren’t needed. The Italian Job didn’t need them, and that’s a cinematic classic. Neither did Citizen Kane, Casablanca or the Godfather. The plot, tempered by a great actor, backed by stirring music. This gives great cinema, and can truly be labelled great.
So what do you think? What makes a great film for you? There are surely areas that you think are important - perhaps scenery, screenplay, director(s) or publicity?Discuss..
Cheers, Stryke.
SPECIAL EFFECTS
Ah, that most controversial and magnificent of areas. I’ve seen plenty of films where bigger and better special effects have ruined what could have been a superb idea. The Mummy Returns is probably the best example. They GCI of the Scorpion King at the end just let it down, and I found myself thinking that it couldn’t hold a candle to The Mummy. Special Effects can cause a movie to forget about other more important areas, such as plot and screenplay. However, if produced in union with these areas, special effects can make a movie live in our memories. Think about films with huge breakthroughs in special effects – Star Wars, Alien, Jurassic Park, The Matrix. These films are pure legends. But is it just because of their special effects? I don’t think so. All these films had great acting and plot. The special effects added to the atmosphere, that is true, but it was just the icing on the cake. I’m afraid that CGI aren’t all they are cracked up to be, although they do bring in the crowds. You could argue that special effects make a successful film, but since when had successful meant great?
ACTING
The visible face of the film. A great actor can carry a film on his shoulders and still give the performance of a lifetime, lifting those around him. Without doubt the most crucial part to a film. A well known motto of film critics is that ‘a great actor should rise about his material’ – basically saying that even if the plot is dire, the film should be good because the actor carries it. Modern myth, or jaded truth? I’d say truth, but only to an extent. Although a truly great actor can carry a film even with a dire plot, it will never be great. Take Gladiator. This film had one of the greatest plots ever, yet I’d bet that without an actor of the calibre of Russell Crowe, it wouldn’t have been saluted as a great. He made that film his own, but only through a symbiotic relationship with the scriptwriters. He gave the plot the representation it deserved, and the plot made him able to show his ability. In all honesty, a great film needs great actors, but there have been exceptions. Look at Star Wars, with Mark Hamill as the lead character, Luke Skywalker. He, without argument, starred in one of the greatest films ever. Channel 4’s Top 100 Film List rated Star Wars: A New Hope/The Empire Strikes Back the top films of all time. Yet you could hardly call Hamill a Hollywood legend. There were others in the film that are some of the film worlds finest – Harrison Ford and Alec Guiness. However, the film is a great film even without a memorable lead actor. So, onwards..
PLOT
Without a good plot, a film is doomed to failure. It’s as simple as that. The plot is what captivates the viewer, controls how we watch the film. Some films have a plot automatically set out for them – these are the book based films – Pelican Brief, Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, Lord of the Rings. All these have great plots, but the problem with books is that a book rarely appeals to everyone. You’ve got fantasy fans who will go to see Lord of the Rings, thriller fans who went to see Silence of the Lambs, and so on. But a truly great plot is written solely for the film, not adapted or taken from elsewhere. This is an argumentative view, but hey, that’s me. George Lucas didn’t take the plot for Star Wars from a book, he created that piece of magic for himself. I think that deserves more credit than to someone who adapted a book. Plot is one of the most important areas, for without it all else in the film will fail. Enough said.
MUSIC
One of the most overlooked, and therefore crucial parts to a film. I wonder how many people sit on the edge of their seats during a particularly gripping scene, or feel their blood rise during a chase, without realising it is the music that is creating the atmosphere? The classic example has to be Jaws. Without the famous John Williams beat to the approaching shark, the film would never have been so gripping. The anticipation that was generated as the music slowly grew faster and faster… You knew what was going to happen, and you wanted it to happen. What a great feeling that was. Another great scene – Maximus charged through the trees in the opening sequence of Gladiator, backed by the Roman cavalry, all screaming ROMA VICTOR!, to the backdrop of another stroke of brilliance from John Williams. I don’t think there will ever be another film moment quite like that. I have always thought that music is what makes a film memorable. Not great, but memorable.
I think everything except special effects is needed. Oh, a great film may be helped on it’s way by special effects, and they can greatly enhance the atmosphere in the cinema, but they aren’t needed. The Italian Job didn’t need them, and that’s a cinematic classic. Neither did Citizen Kane, Casablanca or the Godfather. The plot, tempered by a great actor, backed by stirring music. This gives great cinema, and can truly be labelled great.
So what do you think? What makes a great film for you? There are surely areas that you think are important - perhaps scenery, screenplay, director(s) or publicity?Discuss..
Cheers, Stryke.
Page:
There have been no replies to this thread yet.
To make a truly great film, what do you need? I’ve heard many arguments on this, and there’s always going to be debate. But I think I’ve narrowed it down to certain areas. So, without further ado, let’s proceed.
SPECIAL EFFECTS
Ah, that most controversial and magnificent of areas. I’ve seen plenty of films where bigger and better special effects have ruined what could have been a superb idea. The Mummy Returns is probably the best example. They GCI of the Scorpion King at the end just let it down, and I found myself thinking that it couldn’t hold a candle to The Mummy. Special Effects can cause a movie to forget about other more important areas, such as plot and screenplay. However, if produced in union with these areas, special effects can make a movie live in our memories. Think about films with huge breakthroughs in special effects – Star Wars, Alien, Jurassic Park, The Matrix. These films are pure legends. But is it just because of their special effects? I don’t think so. All these films had great acting and plot. The special effects added to the atmosphere, that is true, but it was just the icing on the cake. I’m afraid that CGI aren’t all they are cracked up to be, although they do bring in the crowds. You could argue that special effects make a successful film, but since when had successful meant great?
ACTING
The visible face of the film. A great actor can carry a film on his shoulders and still give the performance of a lifetime, lifting those around him. Without doubt the most crucial part to a film. A well known motto of film critics is that ‘a great actor should rise about his material’ – basically saying that even if the plot is dire, the film should be good because the actor carries it. Modern myth, or jaded truth? I’d say truth, but only to an extent. Although a truly great actor can carry a film even with a dire plot, it will never be great. Take Gladiator. This film had one of the greatest plots ever, yet I’d bet that without an actor of the calibre of Russell Crowe, it wouldn’t have been saluted as a great. He made that film his own, but only through a symbiotic relationship with the scriptwriters. He gave the plot the representation it deserved, and the plot made him able to show his ability. In all honesty, a great film needs great actors, but there have been exceptions. Look at Star Wars, with Mark Hamill as the lead character, Luke Skywalker. He, without argument, starred in one of the greatest films ever. Channel 4’s Top 100 Film List rated Star Wars: A New Hope/The Empire Strikes Back the top films of all time. Yet you could hardly call Hamill a Hollywood legend. There were others in the film that are some of the film worlds finest – Harrison Ford and Alec Guiness. However, the film is a great film even without a memorable lead actor. So, onwards..
PLOT
Without a good plot, a film is doomed to failure. It’s as simple as that. The plot is what captivates the viewer, controls how we watch the film. Some films have a plot automatically set out for them – these are the book based films – Pelican Brief, Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, Lord of the Rings. All these have great plots, but the problem with books is that a book rarely appeals to everyone. You’ve got fantasy fans who will go to see Lord of the Rings, thriller fans who went to see Silence of the Lambs, and so on. But a truly great plot is written solely for the film, not adapted or taken from elsewhere. This is an argumentative view, but hey, that’s me. George Lucas didn’t take the plot for Star Wars from a book, he created that piece of magic for himself. I think that deserves more credit than to someone who adapted a book. Plot is one of the most important areas, for without it all else in the film will fail. Enough said.
MUSIC
One of the most overlooked, and therefore crucial parts to a film. I wonder how many people sit on the edge of their seats during a particularly gripping scene, or feel their blood rise during a chase, without realising it is the music that is creating the atmosphere? The classic example has to be Jaws. Without the famous John Williams beat to the approaching shark, the film would never have been so gripping. The anticipation that was generated as the music slowly grew faster and faster… You knew what was going to happen, and you wanted it to happen. What a great feeling that was. Another great scene – Maximus charged through the trees in the opening sequence of Gladiator, backed by the Roman cavalry, all screaming ROMA VICTOR!, to the backdrop of another stroke of brilliance from John Williams. I don’t think there will ever be another film moment quite like that. I have always thought that music is what makes a film memorable. Not great, but memorable.
I think everything except special effects is needed. Oh, a great film may be helped on it’s way by special effects, and they can greatly enhance the atmosphere in the cinema, but they aren’t needed. The Italian Job didn’t need them, and that’s a cinematic classic. Neither did Citizen Kane, Casablanca or the Godfather. The plot, tempered by a great actor, backed by stirring music. This gives great cinema, and can truly be labelled great.
So what do you think? What makes a great film for you? There are surely areas that you think are important - perhaps scenery, screenplay, director(s) or publicity?Discuss..
Cheers, Stryke.
SPECIAL EFFECTS
Ah, that most controversial and magnificent of areas. I’ve seen plenty of films where bigger and better special effects have ruined what could have been a superb idea. The Mummy Returns is probably the best example. They GCI of the Scorpion King at the end just let it down, and I found myself thinking that it couldn’t hold a candle to The Mummy. Special Effects can cause a movie to forget about other more important areas, such as plot and screenplay. However, if produced in union with these areas, special effects can make a movie live in our memories. Think about films with huge breakthroughs in special effects – Star Wars, Alien, Jurassic Park, The Matrix. These films are pure legends. But is it just because of their special effects? I don’t think so. All these films had great acting and plot. The special effects added to the atmosphere, that is true, but it was just the icing on the cake. I’m afraid that CGI aren’t all they are cracked up to be, although they do bring in the crowds. You could argue that special effects make a successful film, but since when had successful meant great?
ACTING
The visible face of the film. A great actor can carry a film on his shoulders and still give the performance of a lifetime, lifting those around him. Without doubt the most crucial part to a film. A well known motto of film critics is that ‘a great actor should rise about his material’ – basically saying that even if the plot is dire, the film should be good because the actor carries it. Modern myth, or jaded truth? I’d say truth, but only to an extent. Although a truly great actor can carry a film even with a dire plot, it will never be great. Take Gladiator. This film had one of the greatest plots ever, yet I’d bet that without an actor of the calibre of Russell Crowe, it wouldn’t have been saluted as a great. He made that film his own, but only through a symbiotic relationship with the scriptwriters. He gave the plot the representation it deserved, and the plot made him able to show his ability. In all honesty, a great film needs great actors, but there have been exceptions. Look at Star Wars, with Mark Hamill as the lead character, Luke Skywalker. He, without argument, starred in one of the greatest films ever. Channel 4’s Top 100 Film List rated Star Wars: A New Hope/The Empire Strikes Back the top films of all time. Yet you could hardly call Hamill a Hollywood legend. There were others in the film that are some of the film worlds finest – Harrison Ford and Alec Guiness. However, the film is a great film even without a memorable lead actor. So, onwards..
PLOT
Without a good plot, a film is doomed to failure. It’s as simple as that. The plot is what captivates the viewer, controls how we watch the film. Some films have a plot automatically set out for them – these are the book based films – Pelican Brief, Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, Lord of the Rings. All these have great plots, but the problem with books is that a book rarely appeals to everyone. You’ve got fantasy fans who will go to see Lord of the Rings, thriller fans who went to see Silence of the Lambs, and so on. But a truly great plot is written solely for the film, not adapted or taken from elsewhere. This is an argumentative view, but hey, that’s me. George Lucas didn’t take the plot for Star Wars from a book, he created that piece of magic for himself. I think that deserves more credit than to someone who adapted a book. Plot is one of the most important areas, for without it all else in the film will fail. Enough said.
MUSIC
One of the most overlooked, and therefore crucial parts to a film. I wonder how many people sit on the edge of their seats during a particularly gripping scene, or feel their blood rise during a chase, without realising it is the music that is creating the atmosphere? The classic example has to be Jaws. Without the famous John Williams beat to the approaching shark, the film would never have been so gripping. The anticipation that was generated as the music slowly grew faster and faster… You knew what was going to happen, and you wanted it to happen. What a great feeling that was. Another great scene – Maximus charged through the trees in the opening sequence of Gladiator, backed by the Roman cavalry, all screaming ROMA VICTOR!, to the backdrop of another stroke of brilliance from John Williams. I don’t think there will ever be another film moment quite like that. I have always thought that music is what makes a film memorable. Not great, but memorable.
I think everything except special effects is needed. Oh, a great film may be helped on it’s way by special effects, and they can greatly enhance the atmosphere in the cinema, but they aren’t needed. The Italian Job didn’t need them, and that’s a cinematic classic. Neither did Citizen Kane, Casablanca or the Godfather. The plot, tempered by a great actor, backed by stirring music. This gives great cinema, and can truly be labelled great.
So what do you think? What makes a great film for you? There are surely areas that you think are important - perhaps scenery, screenplay, director(s) or publicity?Discuss..
Cheers, Stryke.
Page: