The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What the hell is all that about anyway, if yoiu buy a fighting game then surely you should control the person fighting and have it real time, no you take your shot, Ill wait and then I have my shot, I hate that!!!
Can anyone help me, have you recently played a good game that was not turn based fighting, I do have on order the New Primal and Tomb Raider, I just hope they do not turn out to be the same.
Please email me @ [email protected] with any thoughts you may have.
Thanks
Enjoy :)
> Hi i thought Kingdom Hearts was a turn based fighting game, or am I
> wrong in this assumption, it does look like a good game but I do not
> want turn based fighting I much prefer real time, where you can fight
> as many monsters that you can at once?
Yup, that's pretty much Kingdom Hearts. No turn-based fighting at all in it, but pseudo random enemies for the most part. There's not much to the fighting system though, just mash the 'X' button to flail your sword about and the other buttons to fire off your spells that you've collected, but doing it all in real-time takes a bit of getting used to. That's something which I thought Drakkan excelled at. Kingdom Hearts is a lot more frantic though.
> Kingdom Hearts (Hack, slash, magic, but more an RPG than hack/slash)
Oops, and pseudo-random battles, the baddies always pop up in the same places though, but the fighting is real-time.
Warriors of Might and Magic (Hack, slash, magic, panned by the press, I've got it and don't really see the problem apart from naff graphics, gameplay is pretty solid)
Kingdom Hearts (Hack, slash, magic, but more an RPG than hack/slash)