The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well, maybe not ever but it's still excellent!
http://194.29.64.17/thecog/cog.mov
4.9meg
It took 607 takes to get it right!
http://194.29.64.17/thecog/cog.mov
4.9meg
It took 607 takes to get it right!
Page:
El Tribute wrote:
> Shh.
>
> That made no sense.
>
> And you're not gerrid.
I'm not? Well spank my wardrobe, and call me shanks.
> So get your coat and leave
I'm not wearing my coat. I guess i'll just have to stay. oh no.
> Shh.
>
> That made no sense.
>
> And you're not gerrid.
I'm not? Well spank my wardrobe, and call me shanks.
> So get your coat and leave
I'm not wearing my coat. I guess i'll just have to stay. oh no.
CGI is Computer Graphics Imaginary...I looked it up because I also wanted to know. Anyway, he's saying it wasn't done by hand and to be honest, I believe him.
And another thing, how would you weigh a tyre to make it roll UP hill, it defys ALL laws of physics, even Newton.
And another thing, how would you weigh a tyre to make it roll UP hill, it defys ALL laws of physics, even Newton.
Chemical Ali wrote:
> Probably because of the physics-defying tyre that rolls uphill.
>
> CGI
What does CGI mean?
The tires were weighted using bolts so that they would roll uphill...
> Probably because of the physics-defying tyre that rolls uphill.
>
> CGI
What does CGI mean?
The tires were weighted using bolts so that they would roll uphill...
Shh.
That made no sense.
And you're not gerrid.
So get your coat and leave
That made no sense.
And you're not gerrid.
So get your coat and leave
GOOD OL' HONDA ACCORED ADVERT THAT ROCKS MY WHALE!
Nobody can beat the Levi's one
'Kevin loved his whell, but one day IT BROKE!
Kevin grew bored, and died'
How I loved that hamster.
'Kevin loved his whell, but one day IT BROKE!
Kevin grew bored, and died'
How I loved that hamster.
consumer58 wrote:
> It is great but it's a rip off.
> There was a piece of video art in the late 80's that did it much
> better, and the whole sequence lasted 20 minutes - it was totally
> amazing.
>
> c58
It was about 30 minutes, and full of slightly dodgy camera cuts if I remember correctly.
> It is great but it's a rip off.
> There was a piece of video art in the late 80's that did it much
> better, and the whole sequence lasted 20 minutes - it was totally
> amazing.
>
> c58
It was about 30 minutes, and full of slightly dodgy camera cuts if I remember correctly.
consumer58 wrote:
> There was a piece of video art in the late 80's that did it much
> better, and the whole sequence lasted 20 minutes - it was totally
> amazing.
But was it all properly done with no trickery?
Although one bit (the exhaust pipe rolling round) is sort of a cheat - they had to cut it in half to make it work, so it's not all natural car parts.
> There was a piece of video art in the late 80's that did it much
> better, and the whole sequence lasted 20 minutes - it was totally
> amazing.
But was it all properly done with no trickery?
Although one bit (the exhaust pipe rolling round) is sort of a cheat - they had to cut it in half to make it work, so it's not all natural car parts.
phi11ip wrote:
> It took 607 takes to get it right!
Probably because of the physics-defying tyre that rolls uphill.
CGI
> It took 607 takes to get it right!
Probably because of the physics-defying tyre that rolls uphill.
CGI
It is great but it's a rip off.
There was a piece of video art in the late 80's that did it much better, and the whole sequence lasted 20 minutes - it was totally amazing.
c58
There was a piece of video art in the late 80's that did it much better, and the whole sequence lasted 20 minutes - it was totally amazing.
c58
Page: