The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
1) There is no reason not to.
2) The post wasn`t great, but its not like there`s anything better on the forums.
3) He has more than 30 words in his post.
4) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll take it by force.
5) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll post loads of spam until he does.
6) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll complain, over and over and over...
7) When Tony fiddled with the messages once, my name was temporarily made into a Staff Regular (for about 15 seconds). I feel this gives me the right to help pick Tarrant as a winner.
8) There is no reason 8).
9) He posted a jolly decent topic on why he should.
10) See line 1.
Tarrant for Notable.
Tarrant for GAD.
2) The post wasn`t great, but its not like there`s anything better on the forums.
3) He has more than 30 words in his post.
4) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll take it by force.
5) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll post loads of spam until he does.
6) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll complain, over and over and over...
7) When Tony fiddled with the messages once, my name was temporarily made into a Staff Regular (for about 15 seconds). I feel this gives me the right to help pick Tarrant as a winner.
8) There is no reason 8).
9) He posted a jolly decent topic on why he should.
10) See line 1.
Tarrant for Notable.
Tarrant for GAD.
Page:
HE wernt the first! Prosecution displays exhibit a: "Blatant Blagging" in the Sony forum.
I am the Tarrant wrote:
> God damn it ssxpro, in your bid to secure my GAD, you've presented the only
> likely competition for my post!
Nah, don`t worry. Remember point 10 of your post - originality (was it 10?). You got there first, so you get to be a GAD.
There'll be a split decision within house SR,
> they'll all have to work overtime deciding whether I get it or you get
> it.
True. I think we`re both very close, but again, you were there first. Maybe we should start more topics like this - perhaps the person with the most identical topics will win?
>Still a good topic, it needed saying
Absolutely! :-)
> God damn it ssxpro, in your bid to secure my GAD, you've presented the only
> likely competition for my post!
Nah, don`t worry. Remember point 10 of your post - originality (was it 10?). You got there first, so you get to be a GAD.
There'll be a split decision within house SR,
> they'll all have to work overtime deciding whether I get it or you get
> it.
True. I think we`re both very close, but again, you were there first. Maybe we should start more topics like this - perhaps the person with the most identical topics will win?
>Still a good topic, it needed saying
Absolutely! :-)
1) There is no reason not to.
2) The post wasn`t great, but its not like there`s anything better on the forums.
3) He has more than 30 words in his post.
4) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll take it by force.
5) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll post loads of spam until he does.
6) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll complain, over and over and over...
7) When Tony fiddled with the messages once, my name was temporarily made into a Staff Regular (for about 15 seconds). I feel this gives me the right to help pick Tarrant as a winner.
8) There is no reason 8).
9) He posted a jolly decent topic on why he should.
10) See line 1.
Tarrant for Notable.
Tarrant for GAD.
2) The post wasn`t great, but its not like there`s anything better on the forums.
3) He has more than 30 words in his post.
4) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll take it by force.
5) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll post loads of spam until he does.
6) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll complain, over and over and over...
7) When Tony fiddled with the messages once, my name was temporarily made into a Staff Regular (for about 15 seconds). I feel this gives me the right to help pick Tarrant as a winner.
8) There is no reason 8).
9) He posted a jolly decent topic on why he should.
10) See line 1.
Tarrant for Notable.
Tarrant for GAD.
Page: