The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
1) There is no reason not to.
2) The post wasn`t great, but its not like there`s anything better on the forums.
3) He has more than 30 words in his post.
4) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll take it by force.
5) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll post loads of spam until he does.
6) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll complain, over and over and over...
7) When Tony fiddled with the messages once, my name was temporarily made into a Staff Regular (for about 15 seconds). I feel this gives me the right to help pick Tarrant as a winner.
8) There is no reason 8).
9) He posted a jolly decent topic on why he should.
10) See line 1.
Tarrant for Notable.
Tarrant for GAD.
2) The post wasn`t great, but its not like there`s anything better on the forums.
3) He has more than 30 words in his post.
4) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll take it by force.
5) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll post loads of spam until he does.
6) If he doesn`t get it, he`ll complain, over and over and over...
7) When Tony fiddled with the messages once, my name was temporarily made into a Staff Regular (for about 15 seconds). I feel this gives me the right to help pick Tarrant as a winner.
8) There is no reason 8).
9) He posted a jolly decent topic on why he should.
10) See line 1.
Tarrant for Notable.
Tarrant for GAD.
Page:
You know I would really actually love it if you won, I suppose I should type a lol to describe how I feel about this post instead of writing ha over and over.
No offence taken! Though how anyone would even understand how "biscuit" could be removed from "spam" is quite beyond me, so them then knowing that it could be construed as offensive is something of a longshot, I'm sure you'll agree.
Also, how do you define spam? The original post "10 reasons why Tarrant should win todays GAD" was a legitimate GAD attempt, as worthy, if not more so, as any other of the days posts. What then followed was a conversation based around this topic. If you consider that as spam, than for what reason is the "spam" in this topic deemed to have biscuit removing qualities? What makes it so special?
If, however, you'll agree with me that the conversation that follows up a topic is not spam, then the posts/ topics I thought you originally referred to were in fact not deemed to have biscuit removing qualities.
What we are left with is one possible explanation; the biscuit removing "spam" post that you spoke of, was infact your own post informing us of its qualities, as that is the only post in this thread that is "off topic".
Tarrant: Apparently not to be messed with
Also, how do you define spam? The original post "10 reasons why Tarrant should win todays GAD" was a legitimate GAD attempt, as worthy, if not more so, as any other of the days posts. What then followed was a conversation based around this topic. If you consider that as spam, than for what reason is the "spam" in this topic deemed to have biscuit removing qualities? What makes it so special?
If, however, you'll agree with me that the conversation that follows up a topic is not spam, then the posts/ topics I thought you originally referred to were in fact not deemed to have biscuit removing qualities.
What we are left with is one possible explanation; the biscuit removing "spam" post that you spoke of, was infact your own post informing us of its qualities, as that is the only post in this thread that is "off topic".
Tarrant: Apparently not to be messed with
lol!
No offence, but this takes the biscuit out of the word SPAM!
No offence, but this takes the biscuit out of the word SPAM!
I'm waiting for a rainy day to play a "lifetime achievement" card, and see how far I get.
90% of the stuff on here is people asking for games but dressing it up in other poo.
In that respect both these topics are the same as 90% of the other poo.
However, with regard to the content. Mine was amusing and brilliant, yours was brown nosing and irritating.
Which do you think SR sees more of generally?
Anyway, as you say - we should let it lie.
In that respect both these topics are the same as 90% of the other poo.
However, with regard to the content. Mine was amusing and brilliant, yours was brown nosing and irritating.
Which do you think SR sees more of generally?
Anyway, as you say - we should let it lie.
Mine is asking for a GAD using blatant brown nosing.
Yours is asking for a GAD using gags.
a different approach to the same thing. They are the same.
Yours is asking for a GAD using gags.
a different approach to the same thing. They are the same.
I am the Tarrant wrote:
Careful though, Slaveunit will no doubt claim
> it was his plan that he thought of ages ago ;-)
ADMIT IT!!!! I AM THE ORIGINATOR!!!!!
Careful though, Slaveunit will no doubt claim
> it was his plan that he thought of ages ago ;-)
ADMIT IT!!!! I AM THE ORIGINATOR!!!!!
Page: