Viewing Thread:
"Enter the Matrix"

Despite what everyone thinks, this game is actualy very fun. You enter a room and theres like 30 or more guards. I think the close combat fighting is the best part of the game. You run up a wall, flip off and then boot a guard in the head which then sends him into another guard and sends them both tumbling.

His point about NGC leading us to believe games are better than they are in their preview sections is valid though.

89%

Are you mad?



On average about one game a month manages to get 90% or above in NGC, it certainly isn't going to be this pile of crap.

m.o.t wrote:
>I agree i think the game is brilliant, NGC were extremly to Harsh in
>there review and Enter the Matrix should of got at least 89%.

---

Should of?

Hmmm....

Anyway, I don't think they were harsh at all, and the points they made about the game were perfectly acceptable and justified points. They said it starts off really well and seems like it's going to be great, but as the game develops it slowly becomes boring and repetitive, ruining what was a potential great game.

---

>I don't understand why a couple of issues back where they had a first >Hands-On NGC were saying how great it was

---

And the point I made above explains this as well. The Hands-On NGC gave the game high expectations, because, as they said, it's great at the start. Hands-On NGC was coming from them playing the game for a couple of hours, and in that time they'll have thought the game to be fairly good from what they've seen. But as they said, it didn't live up to their expectations the whole way through.

It's a cash in that looked good at the start but slowly faded away as it progressed.

m.o.t wrote:
> the only good thing they had to say about it was the fighting, what
> more do they want??

The rest of the game to be good and not a big pile of crud?

I agree i think the game is brilliant, NGC were extremly to Harsh in there review and Enter the Matrix should of got at least 89%. I don't understand why a couple of issues back where they had a first Hands-On NGC were saying how great it was, and then you look at the review and the only good thing they had to say about it was the fighting, what more do they want?? Also Cube-europe said there wasn't a multiplayer (which lowered the score) but there actually is, you get the code while Hacking, it's not fantastic but it's a little extra. Perhaps everyone was expecting too much and it's not what they hoped for, but i really like it. :)

Prediction .... right

gamezfreak wrote:
> Someone should watch the gameplay footage on this months OXM disk.

---

I watched it on GamesMaster's demo last issue, and I gave my opinion after doing so.

I think it looks more like an N64 game than a GameCube/PS2/Xbox game, and I really don't think that is good at all.

I also played the game today, and really, I find it depressing. Dull. Crud.

Auf deutsch™ wrote:
> I just finished it (after 2 evenings play :S) and the ending is very,
> very sweet,...I won't spoil it for ya tho :D

How many levels does it have, and how long did it take? Isnt there a seperate story for the 2 charaters or is it one level your the bloke the other your the woman? Thinking of getting the game as I do like the Matrix and the game is suppose to contain actual footage not in the movies. Played it earlier in Game and was quite impressed with what I saw of it.

Someone should watch the gameplay footage on this months OXM disk.

and they said Zelda is too easy...
It last longer that a couple of hours