The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If you have anything to say. Say it here.
[Captain's Log: 10/03/04 - Day of the Edit Post Feature]
[Diary Entry: 7/7/05 - "We shall never forget"]
> Cooky smiled:
":)"
That doesn't show EXACTLY how you feel now does
> it Cooky! :)
Quite true! :D~
>> Anyway....Buffy's on tonight!!
That on SKY or something?
Which ep is it?
:)
> Easy tiger!
Even in 16 colors she's looking good. Except a little more like
> sarah michelle geller?
: S
Didn't really answer my question!
:(
":)"
That doesn't show EXACTLY how you feel now does it Cooky! :)
And I agree that she does look more like Sarah Michelle Gellar!
Hmmmm....imagine Britney mixed with Sarah....*starts drouling and cannot concentrate*
Anyway....Buffy's on tonight!!
:)
Even in 16 colors she's looking good. Except a little more like sarah michelle geller?
: S
http://sp.reserve.co.uk/news/
story.php?id=1516&af=ur210202
I thought it was only PS2 and GBA bound!
:)
> The black GBA is a new colour for it Dr.Duck. Just look in the SR mag if you
> think it's your PC.
Doesn't look bad, i prefer most of the old colors though.
I guess the black one is to match the cube color scheme.
Hey, maybe we'll see them in spice too. *shudder*
: )
> Lord Naoshige said, "An ancestor's good or evil can be determined by the
> conduct of his descendants."
ie, conduct of decendants is *resultant* of the nature of their ancestors.
A descendant should act in a way that will
> manifest the good in his ancestor and not the bad.
ie, a descendant has control of how thir conduct, and can use it to express qualities of thier ancestors.
To me, the two statements disagree. The first says that an individual's conduct is determined by something other than the individual, the second acknowledges freedom of choice in the individual.
Unless of course Lord N. meant to claim only influence of an individuals conduct was exerted by thier ancestors. Which, at least in terms of genetics, is actually scientifically proven too. That, or he meant to suggest that by the individual's conduct, people will judge also the individual's ancestors.
> This is filial piety.
ie, this is the decendant's expression of great devotion and respect to their ancestry.
Which, to me, supports the latter of the previous two statements, and the possibility that Lord N meant to claim the descendant's ancestors would be judged by his own conduct.
Well, that's how i interpreted it anyway : )
Or maybe cooky's just full of shi..lly quotationsh
; )