The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I have a drea, a dream in which all status' are equal. A dream in which regualrs and notables will treat newbies as they would treat themselves. ladies and Gentleman i have a dream.....
Page:
Kiriyama wrote:
> Zamboogle wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Permanent ban. And I have been banned for many things, including
> copying reviews, copying posts, making an "offensive" post
> (which was actually in jest to another posters topic) and basically
> repeat offences of the above. Luckily I am now proud to say that I'm
> on the straight and narrow :)
>
> ok you sound like a bit of a rebel to me...
>
> I was back in the day (over 2 years ago), but now I'm a washed up git
> :0D
ye but your still her....so what is your copularity pontests, i realsied im in it (whatever it is ) yay!!
> Zamboogle wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Permanent ban. And I have been banned for many things, including
> copying reviews, copying posts, making an "offensive" post
> (which was actually in jest to another posters topic) and basically
> repeat offences of the above. Luckily I am now proud to say that I'm
> on the straight and narrow :)
>
> ok you sound like a bit of a rebel to me...
>
> I was back in the day (over 2 years ago), but now I'm a washed up git
> :0D
ye but your still her....so what is your copularity pontests, i realsied im in it (whatever it is ) yay!!
Zamboogle wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Zamboogle wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> including everyone or just one person?
>
> everyone, but a topic that you have started, not joined in with....
>
> Mine goes into about the 400-500 mark with the Copularity Pontests
> that I used to do.
>
> wow, thats very impressive
>
> Thanks. And I've done a new Pontest to try and beat my record of
> that.
> We must break the 500-post barrier to be certain :D
>
> hey im not too sure, what is the aim of it? what do you do?
Go see the post. If you still don't get it, it's where we leave comments about each other. Something I came up with a few months after I came here, about two years ago, in fact.
Ah, the memories. I remember when we were all the same colour and there was no status. Ah...
> Kiriyama wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Zamboogle wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> including everyone or just one person?
>
> everyone, but a topic that you have started, not joined in with....
>
> Mine goes into about the 400-500 mark with the Copularity Pontests
> that I used to do.
>
> wow, thats very impressive
>
> Thanks. And I've done a new Pontest to try and beat my record of
> that.
> We must break the 500-post barrier to be certain :D
>
> hey im not too sure, what is the aim of it? what do you do?
Go see the post. If you still don't get it, it's where we leave comments about each other. Something I came up with a few months after I came here, about two years ago, in fact.
Ah, the memories. I remember when we were all the same colour and there was no status. Ah...
Zamboogle wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Permanent ban. And I have been banned for many things, including
> copying reviews, copying posts, making an "offensive" post
> (which was actually in jest to another posters topic) and basically
> repeat offences of the above. Luckily I am now proud to say that I'm
> on the straight and narrow :)
>
> ok you sound like a bit of a rebel to me...
I was back in the day (over 2 years ago), but now I'm a washed up git :0D
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Permanent ban. And I have been banned for many things, including
> copying reviews, copying posts, making an "offensive" post
> (which was actually in jest to another posters topic) and basically
> repeat offences of the above. Luckily I am now proud to say that I'm
> on the straight and narrow :)
>
> ok you sound like a bit of a rebel to me...
I was back in the day (over 2 years ago), but now I'm a washed up git :0D
Kiriyama wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Zamboogle wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> including everyone or just one person?
>
> everyone, but a topic that you have started, not joined in with....
>
> Mine goes into about the 400-500 mark with the Copularity Pontests
> that I used to do.
>
> wow, thats very impressive
>
> Thanks. And I've done a new Pontest to try and beat my record of that.
> We must break the 500-post barrier to be certain :D
hey im not too sure, what is the aim of it? what do you do?
> §pånkër wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Zamboogle wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> including everyone or just one person?
>
> everyone, but a topic that you have started, not joined in with....
>
> Mine goes into about the 400-500 mark with the Copularity Pontests
> that I used to do.
>
> wow, thats very impressive
>
> Thanks. And I've done a new Pontest to try and beat my record of that.
> We must break the 500-post barrier to be certain :D
hey im not too sure, what is the aim of it? what do you do?
§pånkër wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Zamboogle wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> including everyone or just one person?
>
> everyone, but a topic that you have started, not joined in with....
>
> Mine goes into about the 400-500 mark with the Copularity Pontests
> that I used to do.
>
> wow, thats very impressive
Thanks. And I've done a new Pontest to try and beat my record of that. We must break the 500-post barrier to be certain :D
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Zamboogle wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> including everyone or just one person?
>
> everyone, but a topic that you have started, not joined in with....
>
> Mine goes into about the 400-500 mark with the Copularity Pontests
> that I used to do.
>
> wow, thats very impressive
Thanks. And I've done a new Pontest to try and beat my record of that. We must break the 500-post barrier to be certain :D
§pånkër wrote:
> Zamboogle wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama, weren't you Shaneo before? Or am I thinking of someone
> else?
>
> Yep, in the flesh.
>
> Heh, how ironic. How's it going mate? Didn't you used to be someone
> else?
>
> No was always me. Never even changed my tagline.
>
> dont you get bored of your name/tagline? i used to be busted but
> peoplee used to think i was name after the band, which i wasnt. so i
> decided to change it.
>
> i used to have a tagline, but then people stopped having taglines, and
> the next time i came on was a couple of days ago and i cant be
> bothered to have one
ok have you only just come back a few days ago? did u take a break or something?
> Zamboogle wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama, weren't you Shaneo before? Or am I thinking of someone
> else?
>
> Yep, in the flesh.
>
> Heh, how ironic. How's it going mate? Didn't you used to be someone
> else?
>
> No was always me. Never even changed my tagline.
>
> dont you get bored of your name/tagline? i used to be busted but
> peoplee used to think i was name after the band, which i wasnt. so i
> decided to change it.
>
> i used to have a tagline, but then people stopped having taglines, and
> the next time i came on was a couple of days ago and i cant be
> bothered to have one
ok have you only just come back a few days ago? did u take a break or something?
Zamboogle wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama, weren't you Shaneo before? Or am I thinking of someone
> else?
>
> Yep, in the flesh.
>
> Heh, how ironic. How's it going mate? Didn't you used to be someone
> else?
>
> No was always me. Never even changed my tagline.
>
> dont you get bored of your name/tagline? i used to be busted but
> peoplee used to think i was name after the band, which i wasnt. so i
> decided to change it.
i used to have a tagline, but then people stopped having taglines, and the next time i came on was a couple of days ago and i cant be bothered to have one
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama, weren't you Shaneo before? Or am I thinking of someone
> else?
>
> Yep, in the flesh.
>
> Heh, how ironic. How's it going mate? Didn't you used to be someone
> else?
>
> No was always me. Never even changed my tagline.
>
> dont you get bored of your name/tagline? i used to be busted but
> peoplee used to think i was name after the band, which i wasnt. so i
> decided to change it.
i used to have a tagline, but then people stopped having taglines, and the next time i came on was a couple of days ago and i cant be bothered to have one
Notorious Biggles wrote:
> No, its a feature. Im a constant in that I never change. Sure I have
> been away and come back quite a few times, but I don't change.
oh ok fair enough. i suppose that way people will always know who you are...
> No, its a feature. Im a constant in that I never change. Sure I have
> been away and come back quite a few times, but I don't change.
oh ok fair enough. i suppose that way people will always know who you are...
No, its a feature. Im a constant in that I never change. Sure I have been away and come back quite a few times, but I don't change.
Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama, weren't you Shaneo before? Or am I thinking of someone
> else?
>
> Yep, in the flesh.
>
> Heh, how ironic. How's it going mate? Didn't you used to be someone
> else?
>
> No was always me. Never even changed my tagline.
dont you get bored of your name/tagline? i used to be busted but peoplee used to think i was name after the band, which i wasnt. so i decided to change it.
> Kiriyama wrote:
> Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Kiriyama, weren't you Shaneo before? Or am I thinking of someone
> else?
>
> Yep, in the flesh.
>
> Heh, how ironic. How's it going mate? Didn't you used to be someone
> else?
>
> No was always me. Never even changed my tagline.
dont you get bored of your name/tagline? i used to be busted but peoplee used to think i was name after the band, which i wasnt. so i decided to change it.
Page: