The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Goldeneye: Rogue Agent'.
Check the latest story on er-no.com
Thats actually all from reliable sources.
Looks like we are in for a shock treat in 2004.
I think so!
Thats actually all from reliable sources.
Looks like we are in for a shock treat in 2004.
I think so!
Page:
I go where the PD goes...
If I could gamble all my other games to get the next Perfect Dark now, I would.
If I could gamble all my other games to get the next Perfect Dark now, I would.
RARE going was a big smack in the teeth so we thought. Obviously not :D
TGMbloke wrote:
> Such a shame about Rare...I think things went way to wrong even before
> MS bought them. Only MS beought them for the name...
Rare are the nearest MS will get to Nintendo gameplay quality. I'd love to see Rare try a Mech game. I still think PD will be the mutts nutts.
We shall have to wait and see....
> Such a shame about Rare...I think things went way to wrong even before
> MS bought them. Only MS beought them for the name...
Rare are the nearest MS will get to Nintendo gameplay quality. I'd love to see Rare try a Mech game. I still think PD will be the mutts nutts.
We shall have to wait and see....
er-no wrote:
> Rare own Conker and Banjo.
>
> Thats about it.
Probably Jet Force Gemini and Killer Instinct too. Mabye Blast Corps too?
> Rare own Conker and Banjo.
>
> Thats about it.
Probably Jet Force Gemini and Killer Instinct too. Mabye Blast Corps too?
TGMbloke wrote:
> How comes Rare put Conkers N64 game on XBOX then? Goldeneye, Conker
> and Banjo are Rares property arent they?
Something funny went on with Conker. I looked at my copy and it has the THQ logo. So it looks like Nintendo licenced Conker but THQ put up the cash to published it.
> How comes Rare put Conkers N64 game on XBOX then? Goldeneye, Conker
> and Banjo are Rares property arent they?
Something funny went on with Conker. I looked at my copy and it has the THQ logo. So it looks like Nintendo licenced Conker but THQ put up the cash to published it.
Rare also have nobody from the original teams of these games.
Its like having a football without its old amazing players. Keeping the same very good name they are expected to produce excellent games. Now though it'll end up wrong.
Its like having a football without its old amazing players. Keeping the same very good name they are expected to produce excellent games. Now though it'll end up wrong.
Rare own Conker and Banjo.
Thats about it.
Thats about it.
http://www.lik-sang.com/news.php?artc=2963
Woah
Woah
TGMbloke wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> *LMAO!!* :D
>
> MMMM...It appears YOU posted the same message twice too in that room
> advertising joypadjunkies.com or whatever...What irony!
Yes, the site is being strange today. I didn't do it 4 times though!
Still funny.
> Hedfix wrote:
> *LMAO!!* :D
>
> MMMM...It appears YOU posted the same message twice too in that room
> advertising joypadjunkies.com or whatever...What irony!
Yes, the site is being strange today. I didn't do it 4 times though!
Still funny.
TGMBloke, Nintendo would not have to pay anything.
They are remaking a Rare game for the N64, and seeing as they were a Nintendo 2nd party Nintendo hold the rights to that game.
EA do have the liscence to make a Goldeneye game of their own, but they're (allegedly) choosing to remake the Rare classic instead.
They are remaking a Rare game for the N64, and seeing as they were a Nintendo 2nd party Nintendo hold the rights to that game.
EA do have the liscence to make a Goldeneye game of their own, but they're (allegedly) choosing to remake the Rare classic instead.
Page: