The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
2: How can you destroy Hyrule? It's just not right.
3: Ganondorf, in stone, at the bottom of the sea... not dead enough for me I'm afraid.
4: What happened to Ganon?
5: Do you think the next Zelda will be a similar spin off game to Majora's Mask? who knows what adventures Tetra and Link will get up to.
6: Don't you think Tetra should stick with Zelda's dress... far nicer.
7: Where the hell was the excellent party style finale with the credits rolling past scenes of jubilation, imagine a street party in Windfall with maggie dancing with her mobolin to be, Lenzo snapping shots of the photograph fanatic, the gossipers gossiping in the corner, that german guy repeating Sploosh and Kaboom, The legendary fish man saying "kay", Frado and Laruto looking over the town from a distance, the pirates acting like prats, Tingle and co. acting like prats... etc... etc... that is how a zelda game should end. Music was nice mind.
8: Would you let an 8 year old leave home for an unknown adventure out to see...
9: Will we ever see hyrule again?
I tell you it just isn't right.
> I agree with you there, that the fighting system is better and more
> enjoyable on this new installment. But as you did say, it does feel
> unfinished.
>
> And what's that second save all about?
They should really have given it 6 more months but they had a deadline to stick to, Ocarina of Time had no real deadline hence it actually feeling totally complete.
Nevertheless Wind Waker was superb... if it had the 6 months it would be the undisputed best Zelda yet... but I couldn't wait that long and besides the ending opened up for a nice looking sequel.
And what's that second save all about?
> What I thought was a bit of a let down, was the actuall length of the
> game. It seemed to be alot shorter that Ocarina of Time. Another thing
> was that Ocarina of time was full of thigs to do, it seems that there
> are only a few minigames in this new installment.
>
> Still though, it is a very good game anyway ¦:¬)#
The problem is they obviously didn't finish the game, bits where temples were obvious (the last pearl for example) were missing etc...
I preffered the sea in the end, it was funnier than past Zelda's and the fighting system was far more enjoyable... but the rushed feel to the storyline due to the absence of a few temples and cut scenes meant that the storyline wasn't nearly as epic as ocarina of time... which felt very much finished.
Nevertheless I find the new Zelda more laugh a minute fun than the last 2 installments but the last 2 had things this game didn't... its too difficult to choose a winner.
Still though, it is a very good game anyway ¦:¬)
; )
I liked it where Ganondorf got stabbed in the face. It was disturbingly graphic for such a good-hearted game.
> The WInd Waker was not as good as Ocarina of Time...
It was, if not better.
Only bad thing was its lack of land really, although that was no major problem as there was enough.
> I strongly believe that, also, I believe a remake of Link to the Past
> into full 3D would be trully amazing.
When I said that everyone laughed at me.
Bah.