The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Now, I hear that the vote isn't that far away, from antoher Chat topic. I may be wrong, but here's what who I think are the 'main contenders', so to speak. There's 4 of 'em.
Your Honour - Very funny. I don't reckon he is Wookiee, but hey, if he is, both his nicks have some gold. Ain't that nice? No, seriosuly, YH is a decent poster.
Turbonutter - What? That biased idiot? Yes, him. He may be biased, but he is capable of some quality posts, throughout the forums, not just FOG.
Goatboy - My opinion of him has changed, so now I realise that his cynicism is justified, in a way. He writes some meaningful stuff, not funny, just meaningful, which we need as well. More of a Life/DVD'er, but still around a lot in FOG.
RastaBillySkank - Go WLT! He stays out of Chat, but his posts on Prime are well thought-out, execpt in WLT :) He wins often and deservedly.
So, there's my main contenders. I know which one I'm voting for. Do you? ;-)
Your Honour - Very funny. I don't reckon he is Wookiee, but hey, if he is, both his nicks have some gold. Ain't that nice? No, seriosuly, YH is a decent poster.
Turbonutter - What? That biased idiot? Yes, him. He may be biased, but he is capable of some quality posts, throughout the forums, not just FOG.
Goatboy - My opinion of him has changed, so now I realise that his cynicism is justified, in a way. He writes some meaningful stuff, not funny, just meaningful, which we need as well. More of a Life/DVD'er, but still around a lot in FOG.
RastaBillySkank - Go WLT! He stays out of Chat, but his posts on Prime are well thought-out, execpt in WLT :) He wins often and deservedly.
So, there's my main contenders. I know which one I'm voting for. Do you? ;-)
Page:
Photo-Genetic wrote:
> i have no chance. i have this horrible way of getting up people's backs.
up their backs?
Surely you mean on their nerves?
> i have no chance. i have this horrible way of getting up people's backs.
up their backs?
Surely you mean on their nerves?
pb wrote:
um..I thought I'd vote for someone with intelligence?
Did you not vote for me again?
Always good to make fun of yourself ;-)
um..I thought I'd vote for someone with intelligence?
Did you not vote for me again?
Always good to make fun of yourself ;-)
Last on was August 15th or 16th so just over a month maybe.... Not that long ago...
B0p
B0p
When is the next Notable election?
I think it's still a long way off.
I think it's still a long way off.
I reckon RastaBillySkank, Vektor and Myst1que have got a good chance, I haven't got a chance at all really I'm a newomer 'cos I've only been here 140 days me thinks.
pb wrote:
um..I thought I'd vote for
> someone with intelligence?
*Suck up time*
I agree on the same terms, but I feel Tony would be more of a realistic character because of his great style of writing and such a witty humour. He has also contributed loads to the site and is VERY generous.
: - )
um..I thought I'd vote for
> someone with intelligence?
*Suck up time*
I agree on the same terms, but I feel Tony would be more of a realistic character because of his great style of writing and such a witty humour. He has also contributed loads to the site and is VERY generous.
: - )
pb wrote:
I thought I'd vote for
> someone with intelligence?
What a strange notion that is.....
:-)
I thought I'd vote for
> someone with intelligence?
What a strange notion that is.....
:-)
purely fiction wrote:
> Y goatboy pb? why?
um..I thought I'd vote for someone with intelligence?
> Y goatboy pb? why?
um..I thought I'd vote for someone with intelligence?
Page: