The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
It seems I judged this one too quickly as it seems to be the StarFox I was waiting, even the on-foot combat looks great, which surprised me.
Oh, and has anyone else noticed that Wario World was missing 2 worlds?
> I completed it within 10 hours, it was far too easy.
>
> Anyway, no one figured out why there are two missing worlds from Wario
> World, yet?
im intrigued what do you mean?
Anyway, no one figured out why there are two missing worlds from Wario World, yet?
> I still don't know how it took you 'a good 20 hours'.
> WHAT DID YOU SPEND THE OTHER 15 HOURS DOING, HUH?
---
That's better.
A-hah!
(Note: I didn't actually complete it in 5 hours)
Warning do not play it after Zelda is all I can say... Metroid isn't as good and STarfox is V***k.
> I still don't know how it took you 'a good 20 hours'.
> WHAT DID YOU SPEND THE OTHER 5 HOURS DOING, HUH?
Maybe he also counted the time where he fell asleep by mistake.
WHAT DID YOU SPEND THE OTHER 5 HOURS DOING, HUH?
> That's funny as hell. You are joking right?
Truth is, it wasn't original, some puzzles were shockingly simple, the combat was patronising and it was pretty short. But it kept me hooked right the way through thanks to the variation in gameplay and adequate plot. There wasn't one point where I wasn't having fun and in my mind, that makes it a decent game.
I wouldn't give it any more than 7/10, but some of the criticisms thrown at it are ridiculous.
> You ponce around in the Xbox forum telling everyone there's only a
> couple of good games on the system, then you come out with this
> comment.
When do I EVER do that?
Going to have to rent it to see what all the fuss is about.
but it makes you
> want to complete it.
Only reason for doing that was so you could take it back to the shop before the gurantee ran out.
Absoloute, first grade bollacks