The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Has anyone bought the X-Box version of IndyCar Series?
I'm just wondering if it's any good or not, I've heard it's supposed to be very difficult and very detailed when it comes to setting up your vehicle for qualifying and races. It sounds like it would be a fantastic challenge and a lot more involving than most other racers out there.
So what are your opinions on it, is it worth a shot?
I'm just wondering if it's any good or not, I've heard it's supposed to be very difficult and very detailed when it comes to setting up your vehicle for qualifying and races. It sounds like it would be a fantastic challenge and a lot more involving than most other racers out there.
So what are your opinions on it, is it worth a shot?
Page:
Maverick42 wrote:
>
> Never seen it myself (then again, nor have I on Xbox), but alledgedly
> yes.
I'll take your word for it, I'm sure someone will be able to give a definite 'yes or no answer' to this one. I'm not that familiar with PS2 architecture.
>
> Never seen it myself (then again, nor have I on Xbox), but alledgedly
> yes.
I'll take your word for it, I'm sure someone will be able to give a definite 'yes or no answer' to this one. I'm not that familiar with PS2 architecture.
If you'd been a little clearer it would have helped.
*claps*
Maverick42 wrote:
>
> It explains itself ferchristsake! What part don't you understand?
Right I think I get it now. You were saying the PS2 has the worst versions of games but that they aren't far off the quality of the other consoles.
The way it was written made it look as if the statement was contradicting itself.
>
> It explains itself ferchristsake! What part don't you understand?
Right I think I get it now. You were saying the PS2 has the worst versions of games but that they aren't far off the quality of the other consoles.
The way it was written made it look as if the statement was contradicting itself.
Hedfix wrote:
> Maverick42 wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> The PS2 version also has systemlink, actually.
>
> Between 4 consoles for 16 player games?
Never seen it myself (then again, nor have I on Xbox), but alledgedly yes.
> Maverick42 wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> The PS2 version also has systemlink, actually.
>
> Between 4 consoles for 16 player games?
Never seen it myself (then again, nor have I on Xbox), but alledgedly yes.
Maverick42 wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> The PS2 version also has systemlink, actually.
Between 4 consoles for 16 player games?
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> The PS2 version also has systemlink, actually.
Between 4 consoles for 16 player games?
Hedfix wrote:
> I saw it as contradicory and I still do.
>
> Obviously you have explained it better since.
It explains itself ferchristsake! What part don't you understand?
> I saw it as contradicory and I still do.
>
> Obviously you have explained it better since.
It explains itself ferchristsake! What part don't you understand?
Hedfix wrote:
> Maverick42 wrote:
>
>
> I'm absolutely fine with my PS2 version and memory card, and to be
> honest, I don't use the mapmaker much at all. I'll admit it's an
> advantage, but so slight it's hardly an argument.
>
> Nice way to ignore the systemlink superiority.
The PS2 version also has systemlink, actually.
> Maverick42 wrote:
>
>
> I'm absolutely fine with my PS2 version and memory card, and to be
> honest, I don't use the mapmaker much at all. I'll admit it's an
> advantage, but so slight it's hardly an argument.
>
> Nice way to ignore the systemlink superiority.
The PS2 version also has systemlink, actually.
I saw it as contradicory and I still do.
Obviously you have explained it better since.
Obviously you have explained it better since.
Fact is though, it was originally a very clear statement - in the end I HAD to question your intelligence; I thought you were being purposely stupid.
Page: