Viewing Thread:
"New DSi XL 3D next year!!! "

Hi Its Lulu and I'd like to give some important news...
DONT WASTE ON A DSi XL IF YOU HAVE A DSi!
plus there is going to be a NEW DS NEXT YEAR!!!!!!
it lets you play your games in 3D!! I dont know if you have to buy special games... but it is exactly like dsi xl but in 3d so dont buy it if you already have dsi xl already, this is just a warning so you dont end up buying dsi xl and then not wanting it in the next 2 weeks,
oh yeah btw its coming out on MARCH 2011!!! its a while but its worth the wait!
Adios!
-Lulu =3

A DSI XL 3D that is so crazy its tecnically the best ds yet and im starting to save up for it

Yeah, but nintendo are promising 3d and unless they are pulling something absolutely revolutionary its not going to convince me they succeeded. Hell, they haven't convinced me that the dual touch screen idea was necessary for gaming. Yeah i get a hud and all that but most games i buy now don't bother with it. Like castlevania, its pointless and fidelly to implement.

Nintendo aren't incompetent, they won't release a product that causes major headaches again. Remember the Virtual Boy? So do they.

Butch wrote:
> spoonbeast wrote:
> dav2612 wrote:
> You won't need the glasses.
>
> should be interesting then.
>
> If it's anything like the display TV they had in Harrod's the
> other week (yeah that's right, I'm a name-dropping mo-fo) then
> everybody is going to get eye strain. I sat there for a couple of
> minutes and ended up with a headache.

The statue of Mohammed Al-Fayed gave me eye-strain.

spoonbeast wrote:
> dav2612 wrote:
> You won't need the glasses.
>
> should be interesting then.

If it's anything like the display TV they had in Harrod's the other week (yeah that's right, I'm a name-dropping mo-fo) then everybody is going to get eye strain. I sat there for a couple of minutes and ended up with a headache. The best thing I can compare it to is a 'magic eye' picture which you are only able to see if you look at a certain point "past" the picture.

Weird? Yes.
Necessary? Not at all.

dav2612 wrote:
> You won't need the glasses.

should be interesting then.

Alfonse wrote:
> I don't
> really think it's speculation though

The info in the first post was.

You won't need the glasses.

TBH i'm very interested how the 3d aspect is going to work. If it needs those goggles, then forget it. Until 3D can be achieved without it, its uses are limited. Can't say use it to visualise 3d ads from windows, billboards etc.

Whilst avatar showed us what can be achieved with 3d, its still limited to those damn classes. I wear glasses already and i don't need a 2 second pair on my face.

Haha suppose so, but I'm sure you know what I actually mean. Seems very enthusiastic.