The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Twain wrote:
> That depends on your interests, because I can!
>
> Go and read some of the old posts in Prime from quite a while back.
> Thats what I call a decent post.
Yes, me too. A lot of the posts there are great, but they are serious posts. Here, we just like to have a laugh
I think its you who needs to shut up.
> Prime has been dead for over 400 days? Erm yes of course it has...
>
> When Sav, Nomad Soul, Wookie, Dringo, Cyclone etc all used to post
> regularly it used to be good
I've never seen it get more than a two dozen posts in one day, and half of those were probably in the WLT.
> Heh!
>
> You win, I aren't competing with a computer nerd in an online argument
> about someone who doesn't have a life and spends all his time
> posting.
I'M NOT.
I'M NOT.
I'M NOT.
I'M NOT.
I'M NOT.
I'M NOT.
And aren't you being more than slightly 'nerdy' by arguing with someone because they're 'destroying your precious forum?
Looky: I just said the same thing again. I wonder why...oh yes, it's because you say the same thing every post too!
Shut up you fool, you sound like a broken record.
> Considering I can't find '1' that is remotley interesting in any of
> the forums is enough for me to decide that for most of the time you
> post a load of shi*t.
You musn't be very good at looking for things then.
> That depends on your interests, because I can!
Go and read some of the old posts in Prime from quite a while back. Thats what I call a decent post.
> Heh!
>
> You win, I aren't competing with a computer nerd in an online argument
> about someone who doesn't have a life and spends all his time
> posting.
As opposed to someone who spends so little time here he hasn't got a clue? NO EVIDENCE.
>
> There is no competition. I would be ashamed to even consider thinking
> that I had "won" the argument as you so call put it.
Yes you fail to use EVIDENCE and a good quality of reason.
> The
> evidence is in the number of posts you have done in the last 30 days.
Weak very week. How can you dismiss those posts were poor and 'spam'?
> Considering I can't find '1' that is remotley interesting in any of
> the forums is enough for me to decide that for most of the time you
> post a load of shi*t.
When I read this I seem to read "I couldn't find a post to use against you so I'm going to make more generalised and false claims about your posts."
>
> Like I said, competing in an argument with an arogant nerd isn't
> really something I am proud of.
Name calling AGAIN?
>
> Evidently you show off about it...
Well thankyou for graciously bowing out and admitting in a round-about-way that i am NOT destroying the forums. Obviously I expected the sourgrapes...
When Sav, Nomad Soul, Wookie, Dringo, Cyclone etc all used to post regularly it used to be good and when I wasn't doing anything else Imused to enjoy posting. Nothing geeky about that.
Now the forums are filled with pointless topics for the most of the time.
> Considering I can't find '1' that is remotley interesting in any of
> the forums
That depends on your interests, because I can!
> Your ignorance to who has left can be put down to you only being
> around 75 days. The forums used to be decent with people posting good
> stuff in Prime etc
Prime's been dead as long as I can remember. I've been registered for 400+ days too.
> but now there seems to be you and you geeky efforts
> to post 2500 + posts in the last 30 days which is nearly what I have
> done in over 450 days.
You're arguing with someone on the internet about how they're 'destroying' a forum, and you use 'geeky' as an insult. Hmmmm.
> If you honestly think that 2500 posts have been quality then you are
> more of an idiot than I already think you are.
I've never seen any of Hedfix's posts descending into the remarkably ridiculous like yours do regularly.
Your beggining to sound like me...