The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Conflict Desert Storm 2'.
Whilst looking at all the mags on sale in ASDA yesterday I noticed that there was a free playable demo of Desert Storm II.
Im getting the PS2 version on the 19th but I was wondering what you lot thought of the demo seeing as the versions will be similar.
Im getting the PS2 version on the 19th but I was wondering what you lot thought of the demo seeing as the versions will be similar.
Page:
There was an extra 'I'.
Corrected version:
Hedfix wrote:
> So given I buy games mainly for the purposes of multiplayer it seems
> like a good one to get. :)
ie getting Die Hard purely for it's multiplayer mode is what I am doing.
The single player mode is a bonus.
Hedfix wrote:
> So given I buy games mainly for the purposes of multiplayer it seems
> like a good one to get. :)
ie getting Die Hard purely for it's multiplayer mode is what I am doing.
The single player mode is a bonus.
Yes.. wow. You gave in easily.
You're going to change to CDS-2 then?
You're going to change to CDS-2 then?
Yes.. wow. You gave in easily.
You're going to change to CDS-2 then?
You're going to change to CDS-2 then?
So I given I buy games mainly for the purposes of multiplayer it seems like a good one to get. :)
It's multiplayer is a damn sight better, I'll give it that.
Yeah because CDS 2 really has a good Deathmatch mode...
Die Hard is crap all round. To think someone would choose it over CDS-2 is laughable.
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> But the multiplayer? don't make me laugh, it's rubbish.
No way, man. It's suprisingly decent, and is reminiscent of the Goldeneye multiplayer. I have only exercised the original four or five multiplayer levels supplied, and, although being a little limited the element of fun is evident, and makes for a great laugh. I suggest tackling it with an open mind so you can see that some of the ideas are well implemented and it makes for some top draw multiplayer.
Whether you agree or disagree, I am right.
> But the multiplayer? don't make me laugh, it's rubbish.
No way, man. It's suprisingly decent, and is reminiscent of the Goldeneye multiplayer. I have only exercised the original four or five multiplayer levels supplied, and, although being a little limited the element of fun is evident, and makes for a great laugh. I suggest tackling it with an open mind so you can see that some of the ideas are well implemented and it makes for some top draw multiplayer.
Whether you agree or disagree, I am right.
We shall see.
Page: