The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
It aint no HALO, multiplayer has its flaws, the other players are not animated at all! static guns wherever you point to!
Probably i agreee with some of your comments, then when you start to look at the whole package is seems more complete than most games, you already have a great (if not a bit sad) story of a world war, the sound is proper atmospheric, all adds to the feeling, play alone with the 5.1 turned right & you will see what i mean...
Crank up the difficulty & head off to arhnem knights for a brilliant street battle, You could just imagine your grandad being pinned down & shatting his-self for a second before thinking b@llocks & jumping in!
or getting killed, shat happens!
great game, if you dont just rush through, take your time, enjoy...
> No, its not even amazing. It looks bad and is clunky.
>
> Body Harvest was clunky, but was genius. MOH is not genius.
How can it be "clunky"
It is genious
Body Harvest was clunky, but was genius. MOH is not genius.
Or it's published as one in the Xbox classics range anyway :D
You have started about 10 of these topics in the last couple of days. Oh and Frontline is good whilst it lasts, after that its boring. Definitley not a classic.
The one player was good the first time around, however there is little incentive to go back.
RTCW easily beats it in single player, especially as the second chapter heavily rips off Goldeneye (and to good effect).