Viewing Thread:
"OI YOU NO!"

A game that has not even been released yet is getting full scale reviews based on demos, which do not represent the full version of the game of which are WINNING games!!! TWO REVIEWS of This Is Football 2002 have WON games?

SHUT UP DAN YOU IDIOT.

OK? I just don't think that is fair, it's like me writing a review on the GameCube, basing it on what I have seen, and then winning a prize. There are plenty of other reviews to choose from, so what is going on?

Anyway.

Never mind, no one cares.

I'll shut up and naff off.

tara.

How could they possibly know what the games like if it's not out??? That's what I would like to know!!
I wrote a review the same day for Driver 2 which I got 2 months ago and got nowhere. (Please feel sorry for me)

Just in case anyone is wondering, Wookie 7 is not an alter ego of mine!

Seriously though, there is more to life than winning games, if it bothers you so much that people like this are winning, then maybe you should write a review of a game that doesn't even exist.

I dunno?

Cool, well done on your win.

I claim Jak and Daxtar...

What you really thought I had played it?

Pah. :P

Good review, I will go and buy it now.

jd muses 'Hmmm, should I have my say and be banned from winning for ever?'

Ok, How can you review a game that you haven't played?

Well lets see...

Jak and Daxtar is an amazing game. The graphics are fresh and lush and really add to the gaming experience. The water effects are absolutely splendid and the whole immense world is believable and really draws the player into the game.

In Jak and Daxtar you control Jak and attempt to save your friend Daxtar who has changed into a handy rodent sidekick. Some people may say that this game is just revamped Crash as it is made by Naughty Dog. The fact is that this is not true. Crash is simple and linear whereas Jak and Daxtar The precursor legacy is set in a free-roaming world with no loading time between levels.

How do I know this? Well I have played it. Ok thats not true, in fact I have seen no more than screenshots and have read no more than snipets of information. So if I were you I would not trust this review at all. In fact it is pointless.

GAD plz.

Logan wrote:
> Logan writes a review of Mario 4D on the Gamesphere...
> etc...


DOes anyone actually no what 4D Is? At Thorpe Park there is a 3D Cinema that squirts you with water and blowswind at you but I dont think consoles will be doing that and calling it 4D.

Logan writes a review of Mario 4D on the Gamesphere... etc...



but seriously, ewhy don't the staff pick up on this? The WHOLE point of reviews is this: we write reviews. Other gamers who buy from SR use the reviews to chose games. They also come to SR more due to the information they get about games. In return, SR give us games. Great. Until some idiot spoils the whole chain by posting a review that could be totally wrong!

Anyway, Dan if you are annoyed, then why don't you write a letter.