Viewing Thread:
"WWF Forum longest thread"

yep i know its been done in FOG but if they have one why cant we
in here you can write about anything
the so-called phantom-matches-reporter
tony
wwf(obviously)
just anything
i konw we have general topics and rumours and stuff but this is just a place to come a nd do anything(enjoy)
if you dont like it dont use it

Sweet! I muchly appreciate this Antio. I'll make this up to you one day.

Righty, once I've worked out how to post something (lol) Sonic Heroes will be on its way.

It's currently residing in my room. :P

So, I'd guess that they would leave the 4 'major' PPV's as the ones that have just one PPV in the month. I am talking about the Rumble, Wrestlemania, Summerslam and Survivor Series.

All the other months would have 2 PPV's in the month a couple of weeks apart. This is all to do with money isn't it? They wouldn't be in this mess if they actually gave everyone a decent product.

I reckon we'll see a few record buyrate lows.

Grandprix wrote:
> I know, I can't see it happening either. I don't know what time and
> what channel they have Confidential on but ECW would probably be a
> bit too risky for that spot.
>
> Apparently, the WWE are planning to have 2 PPV's in June, a Raw and a
> Smackdown one, eventually leading up to 20 PPV's a year from their
> current 12.

Can anyone else see exactly how this will end up? Two PPVs = lower buyrates, but a higher collective buyrate (WWE hopes). If they're planning on running a Raw brand PPV and a SD! PPV every month then I predict most casual fans will buy just the Raw one and only serious fans will bother with the Smackdown one, unless WWE redistributes some of the talent urgently.

I know, I can't see it happening either. I don't know what time and what channel they have Confidential on but ECW would probably be a bit too risky for that spot.

Apparently, the WWE are planning to have 2 PPV's in June, a Raw and a Smackdown one, eventually leading up to 20 PPV's a year from their current 12.

Grandprix wrote:
> There are rumours of an ECW roster being made to replace Confidential.
> They had better revert to the actual ECW style otherwise it will just
> be WWE's version of ECW.

Can't see it happening, if it did WWE wouldn't be able to put it in confidential's place, they'd have to negotiate a deal with a different TV company that would allow them to go with a riskier style of product. Either that or it would be so toned down it would be just another Raw/Smackdown with a different roster.

There are rumours of an ECW roster being made to replace Confidential. They had better revert to the actual ECW style otherwise it will just be WWE's version of ECW.

Good idea. That would bring back people like Tommy Dreamer and actually give Rob Van Dam something to do.

Aso get rid of the roster split.

I say bring back the hardcore title!

The backstage Hardcore stuff was good but they have to do it properly or it will just suck.