Viewing Thread:
"Most disapointing game of 2003?"

For me it would have to be True Crime. I had been looking forward to TC since 2002 as I was expecting a good contender for the GTA crown. But I found it to be quite a disapointment.

It lacks the freedom of the GTA games, fair enough you can drive around 250sm of LA, but what can you actually do in them?, nothing much. You can't walk around and go onto rooftops, you can't use any planes, boats, or any other mode of transport other than cars. The cars sound terrible, in fact they sound just like they did in Vigilante 8 on the PS1. Actually the sound effects are just atrocious in general.

The cars also feel pretty underwhelming to drive, they all feel feather light and pretty boring. At least in GTA when you get hold of something like a Diablo Stallion, you feel as though you are driving a powerfull car, as it appears to have some weight to it, and the engine sounds fantastic.

But it's main problem is that it freezes up way too often, you can be half way through a difficult mission and the game will freeze, meaning you need to start over again. A major problem in my opinion.

So for me the most dissapointing game of 2003 was True Crime.

So what game were you least impressed with last year, and for what reasons?

the only reason its selling so well on xbox is because there is no competition at all
things would be diiferent if there was an pro evo game on the xbox

You have to give it some credit.

About 6/10.

Maverick42 wrote:
it makes FIFA look average.

Fifa is average

Kernal wrote:
> what? non of them are live enabled! check.
> why are they bad by the way? I think their both great, dont know
> about NFSU because i havent played it, but fifa is V good.

You say NFSU is great, yet you don't know about it? Hm. Oh, and play Pro Evo 3 - it makes FIFA look average.

Kernal wrote:
> I think their both great, dont know about NFSU because i havent played
> it....

How do you know there 'Both' great then?

He was just saying that he didn't think much of those games online. Does it really matter if he posts that in the XBox 'forume'.

You should think. Just in general.

Rickoss wrote:
> When did he say they were Live enabled? He means they're crap on PS2's
> NetWork play, you twonk.

well, if it was about ps2; then what is it doing in xbox forume! think befoer you type, Stupid arent you?

LOL, I bet he said it like that to get a reaction. :P

When did he say they were Live enabled? He means they're crap on PS2's NetWork play, you twonk.

sPiKeCaSt wrote:
> Need for speed underground/Fifa 2004, online play is crap on both,
> underground is total pap, both disappointments.

what? non of them are live enabled! check.
why are they bad by the way? I think their both great, dont know about NFSU because i havent played it, but fifa is V good.