GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Playing God?"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Thu 09/08/01 at 20:17
Regular
Posts: 787
Modern day science. New ventures, new technology, new ideas. Where does it all go too far?

With genetically modification already a reality in farming, a centre of controversy, how soon will it be before they start taking the same approach to humans? Designer Babies, choose their Sex, Eye and hair colour, height, build, features. Imagine that, doesn’t it disturb you? It does me.

But, doesn’t that all just seem wrong? Forget about the dangers, the advantages and the “New age glory” Doesn’t the principle, of making a human being in a way you’d like worry anyone else?

Agreed, in some cases things like choosing the sex of a child may be acceptable, like if there’s a certain disease that’ll only pass to a male child. But, apart from such cases is it right to choose the sex of a child purely on preference? Same with eye-colour and hair colour, can’t you just see these features going through “trends” just like clothe-fashion these days? Would you like to see a whole generation of blue-eyed, blonde haired children?

Screening for Genetic diseases and modifying the genes as needed could also be acceptable, scary thought, but better then for a child to be born without a genetic disease then with. But how serious can the disease be to warrant modifying? Allergies? Asthma? This too could be taken too far.

Think of the implications these could bring, only the rich would be able to afford such a thing as designer babies, given their children an upper hand in life, giving them the chance to do better then the most. The great gap between the rich and the poor will just get wider and wider as more of the rich modify their children to be a success, while the poor depend on luck. Couldn’t this almost separate the rich and poor into separate races?

Ignoring the evidence, ignoring the implications, I still think the idea of creating a child to a “design” is disturbing and wrong. The new step in science is a frightening possibility. Is this method of playing God right?

Iguana
Thu 09/08/01 at 21:14
Regular
Posts: 3,182
Just concerning designer babies: I see no problem with it all.
My reasons being in brief:

1. Choosing the sex of the baby.
In the end I think it will roughly be split 50/50. If most people could choose, I am sure they would on average choose one boy and one girl.

2. Choosing hair, eye and skin colour of the baby.
The human race is incredibly diverse. I suspect that the parents would choose a baby to match their race/racial mix. So we would not be flooded with a "blue-eyed, blonde-haired master race". Black parents see their "ideal" as black. I have no problem with that.

3. To a certain extent we have designer babies naturally anyway. We choose our partners for many reasons, but the "genetic make-up" of the person is a major factor in how we select the future mother or father of our children.
Thu 09/08/01 at 20:55
Posts: 0
I agree in every respect to your comments, and consider that this road should not be taken under any circumstances.
Thu 09/08/01 at 20:17
Regular
"A square watermelon"
Posts: 1,890
Modern day science. New ventures, new technology, new ideas. Where does it all go too far?

With genetically modification already a reality in farming, a centre of controversy, how soon will it be before they start taking the same approach to humans? Designer Babies, choose their Sex, Eye and hair colour, height, build, features. Imagine that, doesn’t it disturb you? It does me.

But, doesn’t that all just seem wrong? Forget about the dangers, the advantages and the “New age glory” Doesn’t the principle, of making a human being in a way you’d like worry anyone else?

Agreed, in some cases things like choosing the sex of a child may be acceptable, like if there’s a certain disease that’ll only pass to a male child. But, apart from such cases is it right to choose the sex of a child purely on preference? Same with eye-colour and hair colour, can’t you just see these features going through “trends” just like clothe-fashion these days? Would you like to see a whole generation of blue-eyed, blonde haired children?

Screening for Genetic diseases and modifying the genes as needed could also be acceptable, scary thought, but better then for a child to be born without a genetic disease then with. But how serious can the disease be to warrant modifying? Allergies? Asthma? This too could be taken too far.

Think of the implications these could bring, only the rich would be able to afford such a thing as designer babies, given their children an upper hand in life, giving them the chance to do better then the most. The great gap between the rich and the poor will just get wider and wider as more of the rich modify their children to be a success, while the poor depend on luck. Couldn’t this almost separate the rich and poor into separate races?

Ignoring the evidence, ignoring the implications, I still think the idea of creating a child to a “design” is disturbing and wrong. The new step in science is a frightening possibility. Is this method of playing God right?

Iguana

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

First Class!
I feel that your service on this occasion was absolutely first class - a model of excellence. After this, I hope to stay with Freeola for a long time!
I am delighted.
Brilliant! As usual the careful and intuitive production that Freeola puts into everything it sets out to do. I am delighted.

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.