The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Surprised no one else has mentioned this! ;¬)
New Freeola Favicons today!
here and here and here MyFreeola missed out and still has this...
Here's an idea - it would be nice if the forum code allowed 'trusted' members to post images directly into the forum.
This could be done on a per user user basis or by number of posts etc. then I could have shown the images rather than linked to them...
New Freeola Favicons today!
here and here and here MyFreeola missed out and still has this...
Here's an idea - it would be nice if the forum code allowed 'trusted' members to post images directly into the forum.
This could be done on a per user user basis or by number of posts etc. then I could have shown the images rather than linked to them...
[s]Hmmm...[/s] Page:
McLong wrote:
> I'm actually surprised you haven't commented on the new
> Freeola.com design Hmmm... (unless you already did and I missed
> it). Good feedback only please ;)
Hi McLong,
I did make a comment on the day! Not sure if you monitor your Twitter 'mentions' though?
> I'm actually surprised you haven't commented on the new
> Freeola.com design Hmmm... (unless you already did and I missed
> it). Good feedback only please ;)
Hi McLong,
I did make a comment on the day! Not sure if you monitor your Twitter 'mentions' though?
[s]Hmmm...[/s] @twitter
Warhunt wrote:
> In fairness though I removed it about 8 seconds after posting 0_o
> Literally. :)
:¬)
FWIW - I only see the MyFreeola 'cogs' Favicon in FF or by linking directly. Perhaps that isn't in .ico format?
> In fairness though I removed it about 8 seconds after posting 0_o
> Literally. :)
:¬)
FWIW - I only see the MyFreeola 'cogs' Favicon in FF or by linking directly. Perhaps that isn't in .ico format?
[s]Hmmm...[/s] 
What McLong said.... I was perhaps a bit vague but I meant internal Favicons etc...
Sorry about the image thing Hmmm....
In fairness though I removed it about 8 seconds after posting 0_o Literally. :)
Sorry about the image thing Hmmm....
In fairness though I removed it about 8 seconds after posting 0_o Literally. :)
Hmmm... wrote:
> Warhunt wrote:
> The new Favicons have been around for a while.
>
> Hi Warhunt,
> I'm sure you must be right!
> But I certainly only started to see them yesterday.
>
> I see the directly structures all have yesterday's date as well
> '2010/02/04' ?! :¬P
Yeah, these have been up for a while for people using any browser other than IE.
Apparently IE only supports favicons that have been properly processed into Mircrosoft .ICO files, so that's why you'll see the files were updated yesterday too!
I'm actually surprised you haven't commented on the new Freeola.com design Hmmm... (unless you already did and I missed it). Good feedback only please ;)
> Warhunt wrote:
> The new Favicons have been around for a while.
>
> Hi Warhunt,
> I'm sure you must be right!
> But I certainly only started to see them yesterday.
>
> I see the directly structures all have yesterday's date as well
> '2010/02/04' ?! :¬P
Yeah, these have been up for a while for people using any browser other than IE.
Apparently IE only supports favicons that have been properly processed into Mircrosoft .ICO files, so that's why you'll see the files were updated yesterday too!
I'm actually surprised you haven't commented on the new Freeola.com design Hmmm... (unless you already did and I missed it). Good feedback only please ;)
Warhunt wrote:
> The new Favicons have been around for a while.
Hi Warhunt,
I'm sure you must be right!
But I certainly only started to see them yesterday.
I see the directly structures all have yesterday's date as well '2010/02/04' ?! :¬P
Warhunt wrote:
...he's gone and removed it...
The images all look different to me!!!
> The new Favicons have been around for a while.
Hi Warhunt,
I'm sure you must be right!
But I certainly only started to see them yesterday.
I see the directly structures all have yesterday's date as well '2010/02/04' ?! :¬P
Warhunt wrote:
...he's gone and removed it...
The images all look different to me!!!
[s]Hmmm...[/s]
The new Favicons have been around for a while. Or internal sites and some others have snuck in earlier. New programmer likes them I think :D
The decision not to allow images was made originally, and even though I've suggested doing so again (obviously this was one of my first ideas) it was rejected.
The decision not to allow images was made originally, and even though I've suggested doing so again (obviously this was one of my first ideas) it was rejected.
Surprised no one else has mentioned this! ;¬)
New Freeola Favicons today!
here and here and here MyFreeola missed out and still has this...
Here's an idea - it would be nice if the forum code allowed 'trusted' members to post images directly into the forum.
This could be done on a per user user basis or by number of posts etc. then I could have shown the images rather than linked to them...
New Freeola Favicons today!
here and here and here MyFreeola missed out and still has this...
Here's an idea - it would be nice if the forum code allowed 'trusted' members to post images directly into the forum.
This could be done on a per user user basis or by number of posts etc. then I could have shown the images rather than linked to them...
[s]Hmmm...[/s] Page: