Viewing Thread:
"Who's the best games company working 4 N64? Rare? THQ? Konami?"

I think Rare are the best. Anybody else?

kingklik wrote:
> Oi, big-mouth! Man, I hate it when people make up sh*t like that.
> Rare are 40%-owned by Nintendo. Get your facts s**traight.


Calm down now King KliK think happy thoughts, thats better.

Oi, big-mouth! Man, I hate it when people make up sh*t like that. Rare are 40%-owned by Nintendo. Get your facts s**traight.

Umm.. hello??? Rare are part of Nintendo, fools - Ninty own Rare, which is why Rare only develop games for them.

Nintendo and Rare working together would be quite amazing.

I think a joint Rare/Nintendo game would be the best in the world. Box Shigsy up and send him to England and get him working with Rare, send some of Shigsy mates as well. It may take a while but the result would be amazing.

well put it this way, Rare have made class games such as goldeneye and CBFD, whilst Nintendo have made class games like Mario and Zelda, i personally can't choose between the two, while both are sort of similar in that they create great games, i reckon that they are both brilliant company's in their own right, and so it's almost impossible to compare them, as each of their games are individual.
slik !_!

Rare didnt buy it, Disney are paying them to make the games.

Who else thinks Rare buying the Mickey Mouse licence was a big mistake? I still think Rare are the best though.

Nnitendo or Rare? hmmmmm. I would have to say Nintendo because I play there games more than I play Rares.
Plus I can't forgive Rare for making a Mickey Mouse game.

Nintendo may be good but i think Rare are better because of games like DK64 and Perfect Dark but Nintendo are very good