The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Goldeneye: Rogue Agent'.
http://www.cube-europe.com/news.php?nid=6172
Page:
er-no wrote:
> /me is still smug
Twice now, and everyone has decline to comment :P...
Until now! Mwhaha!
> /me is still smug
Twice now, and everyone has decline to comment :P...
Until now! Mwhaha!
The overwhelming majority of casual gamers (ie. Playstation owners :P) plus sales from Xbox and Cube would of course make Goldeneye 2 much more profitable than the Xbox exclusive PD0.. if it ever comes out. :)
I tell you what would be interesting, if this went up against PD0 in the charts.
It is sad that EA will reach number 1 with this game due mainly to the fact it has a similar name to a 7 year old game, made by different people and published by a different company.
Shame.
Shame.
/me is still smug
It seems like EA have just stuck the Goldeneye name on for extra sales.
I'll reserve my opinion until more news develops.
I'll reserve my opinion until more news develops.
I'm really interested to see what crap they come up with about Goldfinger being alive.
HE GOT SUCKED OUT OF A PLANE WINDOW!
HE GOT SUCKED OUT OF A PLANE WINDOW!
ok, reading that article....what does this new game have to do with Goldeneye? it bears no resemblance to it whatsoever...like people have said on the comments on the page...they're talking about goldfinger or something...
Belldandy wrote:
> Okay, so if all of you that rubbished and screamed abuse at me when
> er-no did his "Goldeneye 2 N5 Launch Title" topic and I
> said it wouldn't be as good or as important would form a line to
> apologise....
>
> Unless EA makes a decent Bond game, y'know one you can't complete on
> the first couple of tries....
>
> Like that'll happen.
No, actually what you said was 'The N5 does not need another Goldeneye type game'. Where as a fool quite clearly says this :)
However, this does not sound like a Goldeneye type game, hence the anger. And disbelief. Might be good.
> Okay, so if all of you that rubbished and screamed abuse at me when
> er-no did his "Goldeneye 2 N5 Launch Title" topic and I
> said it wouldn't be as good or as important would form a line to
> apologise....
>
> Unless EA makes a decent Bond game, y'know one you can't complete on
> the first couple of tries....
>
> Like that'll happen.
No, actually what you said was 'The N5 does not need another Goldeneye type game'. Where as a fool quite clearly says this :)
However, this does not sound like a Goldeneye type game, hence the anger. And disbelief. Might be good.
I really hate EA now.
Page: