The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Time to move forward with the Election of the next Notable.
One man one vote on August 19th.
You can only vote HERE - in THIS THREAD.
First vote counts - vote twice and you have spoilt your ballot. Don't sign up new names to vote more than one - or you'll be disqualified.
JAT's can't vote and NOR can anybody who signed up less between 1 and 5 days before the vote.
Don't vote for staff - they can't be elected.
Don't vote for JAT's or Newbies - they can't be elected.
Don't vote for Notables - they are already elected.
Do your campaigning here or all over the forums. Drive up your popularity as there can be ONLY ONE new Notable.
DON'T VOTE until August 19th.
When you do vote say "I vote for ...."
That's it. It won't be the same without the er-no campaign.
You er-no it makes sense.
One man one vote on August 19th.
You can only vote HERE - in THIS THREAD.
First vote counts - vote twice and you have spoilt your ballot. Don't sign up new names to vote more than one - or you'll be disqualified.
JAT's can't vote and NOR can anybody who signed up less between 1 and 5 days before the vote.
Don't vote for staff - they can't be elected.
Don't vote for JAT's or Newbies - they can't be elected.
Don't vote for Notables - they are already elected.
Do your campaigning here or all over the forums. Drive up your popularity as there can be ONLY ONE new Notable.
DON'T VOTE until August 19th.
When you do vote say "I vote for ...."
That's it. It won't be the same without the er-no campaign.
You er-no it makes sense.
Page:
ssxbro wrote:
> Tony wrote:
> ssxbro wrote:
> I vote for Wookiee Monster -
> whoever he is.
This vote is not allowed - for the same reason as
> Caz2k.
> It's only the sixth post on this account.
Why is
> that? It doesn't say that in the rules. I started the account over
> 100 days ago so that I could talk to my brother at uni.
I'm sorry but it is not in the spirit of the thing to allow somebody who has only posted five previous messages to take part in this election.
You want big rules then I'll sort them out for next time.
> Tony wrote:
> ssxbro wrote:
> I vote for Wookiee Monster -
> whoever he is.
This vote is not allowed - for the same reason as
> Caz2k.
> It's only the sixth post on this account.
Why is
> that? It doesn't say that in the rules. I started the account over
> 100 days ago so that I could talk to my brother at uni.
I'm sorry but it is not in the spirit of the thing to allow somebody who has only posted five previous messages to take part in this election.
You want big rules then I'll sort them out for next time.
Tony wrote:
> ssxbro wrote:
> I vote for Wookiee Monster - whoever he is.
This vote is not allowed - for the same reason as Caz2k.
> It's only the sixth post on this account.
Why is that? It doesn't say that in the rules. I started the account over 100 days ago so that I could talk to my brother at uni.
> ssxbro wrote:
> I vote for Wookiee Monster - whoever he is.
This vote is not allowed - for the same reason as Caz2k.
> It's only the sixth post on this account.
Why is that? It doesn't say that in the rules. I started the account over 100 days ago so that I could talk to my brother at uni.
Tony wrote:
> er-no wrote:
> Whats the point? Its already been toffeed
> up!
There is a point or I would not ask.
If you have
> accusations then please make them.
OK THEN TONY!
This is nothing against TW. I have been watching over these votes.. and the reasons for becoming a notable are not what many of TW's voters are going for.. he talks to a lot of them on MSN and are his 'friends', yes TW does make the FOG special because he is a great asset, but sadly not as big as someone like wookie or pb.
Also. I feel Khazar has been approaching people on MSn and asking *cough* them to vote for TW instead of anyone else.
I want to vote pb... I always have, but sadly I feel that with my fragile vote I will have to vote for wookie because its the only wayt to stop TW winning (sorry TW).
That is my feelings... not all of them..
Don't you see Tony, all notables have voted for pb because we know whenever he posts he is probably the best there is, Wookie as well! He is excellent. I would like to vote for pb, but I will hold it because it might be able to change something wrong.
Do you see?
> er-no wrote:
> Whats the point? Its already been toffeed
> up!
There is a point or I would not ask.
If you have
> accusations then please make them.
OK THEN TONY!
This is nothing against TW. I have been watching over these votes.. and the reasons for becoming a notable are not what many of TW's voters are going for.. he talks to a lot of them on MSN and are his 'friends', yes TW does make the FOG special because he is a great asset, but sadly not as big as someone like wookie or pb.
Also. I feel Khazar has been approaching people on MSn and asking *cough* them to vote for TW instead of anyone else.
I want to vote pb... I always have, but sadly I feel that with my fragile vote I will have to vote for wookie because its the only wayt to stop TW winning (sorry TW).
That is my feelings... not all of them..
Don't you see Tony, all notables have voted for pb because we know whenever he posts he is probably the best there is, Wookie as well! He is excellent. I would like to vote for pb, but I will hold it because it might be able to change something wrong.
Do you see?
semajal wrote:
> Tony wrote:
> semajal wrote:
> Not today and today is the
> voting day.
Oh
> yes, and how on earth would I be able to
> work out what's going on if
> everybody placed bogus votes all
> over the place.
Rules are rules.
> They are quite
> clear.
Nop the rules say that this is the voteing place and that
> the votes are on 19. It is the 19 and any votes before should not
> be boothered about. Unless they are ones saying "im going on
> holiday"
If you promise not to wind me up any more then I will consider your vote IF it becomes crucial at the end.
> Tony wrote:
> semajal wrote:
> Not today and today is the
> voting day.
Oh
> yes, and how on earth would I be able to
> work out what's going on if
> everybody placed bogus votes all
> over the place.
Rules are rules.
> They are quite
> clear.
Nop the rules say that this is the voteing place and that
> the votes are on 19. It is the 19 and any votes before should not
> be boothered about. Unless they are ones saying "im going on
> holiday"
If you promise not to wind me up any more then I will consider your vote IF it becomes crucial at the end.
ssxbro wrote:
> I vote for Wookiee Monster - whoever he is.
I do this because my
> brother (ssxpro) says its a good idea.
This vote is not allowed - for the same reason as Caz2k. It's only the sixth post on this account.
> I vote for Wookiee Monster - whoever he is.
I do this because my
> brother (ssxpro) says its a good idea.
This vote is not allowed - for the same reason as Caz2k. It's only the sixth post on this account.
Tony wrote:
> semajal wrote:
> Not today and today is the voting day.
Oh
> yes, and how on earth would I be able to work out what's going on if
> everybody placed bogus votes all over the place.
Rules are rules.
> They are quite clear.
Nop the rules say that this is the voteing place and that the votes are on 19. It is the 19 and any votes before should not be boothered about. Unless they are ones saying "im going on holiday"
> semajal wrote:
> Not today and today is the voting day.
Oh
> yes, and how on earth would I be able to work out what's going on if
> everybody placed bogus votes all over the place.
Rules are rules.
> They are quite clear.
Nop the rules say that this is the voteing place and that the votes are on 19. It is the 19 and any votes before should not be boothered about. Unless they are ones saying "im going on holiday"
er-no wrote:
> Whats the point? Its already been toffeed up!
There is a point or I would not ask.
If you have accusations then please make them.
> Whats the point? Its already been toffeed up!
There is a point or I would not ask.
If you have accusations then please make them.
Tony wrote:
> Turbonutter wrote:
> Spider is a notable, when did this happen?
> Don't you mean Sniper?
I must be going mad. He voted for
> Spider of course, not Sniper. Either way it's disqualified!
I'm already a notable.
> Turbonutter wrote:
> Spider is a notable, when did this happen?
> Don't you mean Sniper?
I must be going mad. He voted for
> Spider of course, not Sniper. Either way it's disqualified!
I'm already a notable.
Page: