The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Time to move forward with the Election of the next Notable.
One man one vote on August 19th.
You can only vote HERE - in THIS THREAD.
First vote counts - vote twice and you have spoilt your ballot. Don't sign up new names to vote more than one - or you'll be disqualified.
JAT's can't vote and NOR can anybody who signed up less between 1 and 5 days before the vote.
Don't vote for staff - they can't be elected.
Don't vote for JAT's or Newbies - they can't be elected.
Don't vote for Notables - they are already elected.
Do your campaigning here or all over the forums. Drive up your popularity as there can be ONLY ONE new Notable.
DON'T VOTE until August 19th.
When you do vote say "I vote for ...."
That's it. It won't be the same without the er-no campaign.
You er-no it makes sense.
One man one vote on August 19th.
You can only vote HERE - in THIS THREAD.
First vote counts - vote twice and you have spoilt your ballot. Don't sign up new names to vote more than one - or you'll be disqualified.
JAT's can't vote and NOR can anybody who signed up less between 1 and 5 days before the vote.
Don't vote for staff - they can't be elected.
Don't vote for JAT's or Newbies - they can't be elected.
Don't vote for Notables - they are already elected.
Do your campaigning here or all over the forums. Drive up your popularity as there can be ONLY ONE new Notable.
DON'T VOTE until August 19th.
When you do vote say "I vote for ...."
That's it. It won't be the same without the er-no campaign.
You er-no it makes sense.
Page:
Tony wrote:
YH - you need to vote for the person who
> deserves is most, based on their contribution to the forums.
There are three people who I would like to see made notable.
One of them has already been made.
Both of the other two are not in the lead.
It would make sense to me to vote for the one with most chance of winning. It doesn;t matter which one they are, as I'd like to see both of them made.
My vote may be quite late.....
YH - you need to vote for the person who
> deserves is most, based on their contribution to the forums.
There are three people who I would like to see made notable.
One of them has already been made.
Both of the other two are not in the lead.
It would make sense to me to vote for the one with most chance of winning. It doesn;t matter which one they are, as I'd like to see both of them made.
My vote may be quite late.....
Tony wrote:
YH - you need to vote for the person who
> deserves is most, based on their contribution to the forums.
Tony, will TW become notable if he wins the voting?
Can there be a er-stewarts inquiry?
YH - you need to vote for the person who
> deserves is most, based on their contribution to the forums.
Tony, will TW become notable if he wins the voting?
Can there be a er-stewarts inquiry?
Your Honour wrote:
> Tony wrote:
I'm fairly sure of this.
How much is
> "fairly"? This could affect who I decide to vote for, so
> think carefully.
Nothing can be final until the final curtain closes. Provisional means it may need to be checked.
YH - you need to vote for the person who deserves is most, based on their contribution to the forums.
> Tony wrote:
I'm fairly sure of this.
How much is
> "fairly"? This could affect who I decide to vote for, so
> think carefully.
Nothing can be final until the final curtain closes. Provisional means it may need to be checked.
YH - you need to vote for the person who deserves is most, based on their contribution to the forums.
Your Honour wrote:
> Tony wrote:
I'm fairly sure of this.
How much is
> "fairly"? This could affect who I decide to vote for, so
> think carefully.
:-)
Yes Tony, this could affect if Your Honour is the first person to vote for me.
> Tony wrote:
I'm fairly sure of this.
How much is
> "fairly"? This could affect who I decide to vote for, so
> think carefully.
:-)
Yes Tony, this could affect if Your Honour is the first person to vote for me.
Tony wrote:
I'm fairly sure of this.
How much is "fairly"? This could affect who I decide to vote for, so think carefully.
:-)
I'm fairly sure of this.
How much is "fairly"? This could affect who I decide to vote for, so think carefully.
:-)
Your Honour wrote:
> Tony, are you sure? Is this taking into account ALL of the disallowed votes?
I'm fairly sure of this.
> Tony, are you sure? Is this taking into account ALL of the disallowed votes?
I'm fairly sure of this.
SHEEPY wrote:
> All that for nothing ;-)
You didn't say " I vote for...
> "
he he
Your dumb :D
It's OK I have allowed this and ResFan's.
> All that for nothing ;-)
You didn't say " I vote for...
> "
he he
Your dumb :D
It's OK I have allowed this and ResFan's.
All that for nothing ;-)
You didn't say " I vote for... "
he he
Your dumb :D
You didn't say " I vote for... "
he he
Your dumb :D
After much coin tossing, recieving of bribes, consultations with my lawyers and an argument with my wife...
I have decided that the person most deserving of my vote is....
*DRUM ROLE*
(pause for affect)
WOOKIEE MONSTER!!!!!
(applause)
*Tarrant exits stage right. Curtain closes, audience wipes away tears and goes home to kiss their children and thank the lord for having created such a wonderous being as Tarrant*
The End
I have decided that the person most deserving of my vote is....
*DRUM ROLE*
(pause for affect)
WOOKIEE MONSTER!!!!!
(applause)
*Tarrant exits stage right. Curtain closes, audience wipes away tears and goes home to kiss their children and thank the lord for having created such a wonderous being as Tarrant*
The End
Page: