The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Sony's PS2 already has a massive userbase, and the un-equalled 'everyman' image. They've become the image of gaming for the majority of the public, arguably the most important type of consumers, the so-called 'casual gamers'. It's a measure of how far gaming has come that, whereas previously these people considered the likes of Mario and Sonic un-cool, they are now the same people looking forward to Metal Gear Solid 2, or playing Tekken Tag.
Then there's Nintendo. They have a dedicated fanbase, who will purchase any new hardware the company release, and, assuming that this time around the Gamecube's launch is met with an extensive list of software, and sensible pricing (problems which afflicted the N64's launch in 1997), Nintendo, like Sony, should also find themselves in a healthy position within the market.
Microsoft however is the 'dark horse', the underdog with little expertise in this field, but a massive budget. However, they have the proven marketing nous, and the machine to really make a large impact on the market, something I doubt they'll fail to do. More of a threat to the PS2 than a serious alternative, the underlying point is that it's un-likely either of these consoles will lose out, which is only good news for gamers like us.
The videogames market has, in my opinion, reached a stage where more than two formats can be supported, where consequential profits will be sufficent for Sony, Nintendo AND Microsoft to continue producing hardware and creating great games, because of the far larger number of customers. It is arguable, that given a stronger financial status, Sega and their Dreamcast would also have survived it's culling, as it's sales figures were quite impressive considering it's lowly status among 'casuals'.
These are very healthy times for the industry. Let's just hope the major players can realise that, using that knowledge to their advantage.
Dan does, as do I, but not Wooklie.
I like your posts, they remind me of my dog.
> i think that the gamecube will triumph in the console wars. i also
> think that the x-box is not the dark horse the gamecuube is as not
> many people own the excellent N64 compared to the boring greystation
> with its crap games. to win the consoe wars i think the console
> should be more games orientated than concentrating on online
> gaming.
Hopefully, if any one console deserves to come on top in the 'war', it's the Gamecube. Nintendo's policy of concentrating on pure gameplay as opposed to online play is inspired and commendable, but really, Nintendo have proven themselves in the industry, whereas this is Microsoft's first venture into consoles, so naturally they'll want to get everything right. Microsoft as a brand name for gaming is still slightly suspect, and this is where Sony and Nintendo have the upper hand.
> calm down wookie monster
Eh? I wasn't ranting - just explaining the responses.
> Um, do you agree, or think I'm a fool? Hopefully it's a bit of both
> lol.
No offence, creep (it's odd calling someone that without it sounding like an insult), but there are just SO many of these conseole wars topics that a lot of the regulars get frustrated, and barely get past the first few lines.
It's probably the worst topic a 'Newbie' can choose to write about, but at the same time we can't shout at you about it because you don't necessarily know how many of these have appeared before.
Just don't be surprised or offended if you don't get too many serious replies!
> >Dan2K1 adopts er-no's policy of smashing one's head against the wall<
*Wookiee joins Dan2K1*