The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
So what is your Favourite FF now after getting your hands on FF X-2?
My Favourites are FF7 and FF8, if I had to choose, which is near impossible I'd probably choose FF8.
I didn't really like FFIX much at all, I thought that Square should not have bothered with this one.
I have nearly all the FF games, apart from Final Fantasy XI.
And I definately need to spend some more time on FF X-2, which is definately unique, and is aready giving me some joy.
My Favourites are FF7 and FF8, if I had to choose, which is near impossible I'd probably choose FF8.
I didn't really like FFIX much at all, I thought that Square should not have bothered with this one.
I have nearly all the FF games, apart from Final Fantasy XI.
And I definately need to spend some more time on FF X-2, which is definately unique, and is aready giving me some joy.
Page:
Electrum wrote:
> FFX-2 is.. disappointing.
No it's not. It is a great game. But if you compare it to FF7 then yeah it is disappointing.
> FFX-2 is.. disappointing.
No it's not. It is a great game. But if you compare it to FF7 then yeah it is disappointing.
FFX-2 is.. disappointing.
Yeah, that was kind of like what I said only less eloquent.
Cusack wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> jenneul wrote:
> I didn't really like FFIX much at all, I thought that Square should
> not have bothered with this one.
>
> It would have been quite weird to skip from 8 to 10.
> No, because if they made 8 then 10 then they wouldn't call it
> "FF 10", FF 10 would be called "FF 9"
Well done *claps*
> Blank wrote:
> jenneul wrote:
> I didn't really like FFIX much at all, I thought that Square should
> not have bothered with this one.
>
> It would have been quite weird to skip from 8 to 10.
> No, because if they made 8 then 10 then they wouldn't call it
> "FF 10", FF 10 would be called "FF 9"
Well done *claps*
Cusack wrote:
> No, because if they made 8 then 10 then they wouldn't call it
> "FF 10", FF 10 would be called "FF 9"
And therein lies the joke, my friend. Let the others know if you spot it.
> No, because if they made 8 then 10 then they wouldn't call it
> "FF 10", FF 10 would be called "FF 9"
And therein lies the joke, my friend. Let the others know if you spot it.
Blank wrote:
> jenneul wrote:
> I didn't really like FFIX much at all, I thought that Square should
> not have bothered with this one.
>
> It would have been quite weird to skip from 8 to 10.
No, because if they made 8 then 10 then they wouldn't call it "FF 10", FF 10 would be called "FF 9"
> jenneul wrote:
> I didn't really like FFIX much at all, I thought that Square should
> not have bothered with this one.
>
> It would have been quite weird to skip from 8 to 10.
No, because if they made 8 then 10 then they wouldn't call it "FF 10", FF 10 would be called "FF 9"
No sequel. No prequel.
JUST LEAVE IT ALONE!?!?!?!!11
JUST LEAVE IT ALONE!?!?!?!!11
My thoughts exactly.
A remake is pointless.
A sequel / successor would be nice, though I wouldn't be bothered if it never happens.
A remake is pointless.
A sequel / successor would be nice, though I wouldn't be bothered if it never happens.
Can't improve on perfection so they should just leave FF7 alone. I wouldn't mind a prequel or sequel for it but not a remake.
voices will ruin it, the rendered backgrounds r perfect allreaddy, even look good on my PS2 compaired to other games. The 1 thing they should remake would be character modals, but then it would be nice to have a remake in the same vain as resident evil remake.
Page: