The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What are you considering to buy next?
Whats the newest/hottest game out this year?
Basically write out a list of the games you want to buy and a little description why,
e.g
On my wanted list is:
Fifa 2005 (bound to be the best Fifa ever)
GTA San Andreas (You can't go wrong with the GTA series)
LMA Manager 2005 (i like these sort of games and this will be classic)
etc. etc. etc.
you get the idea.
Whats the newest/hottest game out this year?
Basically write out a list of the games you want to buy and a little description why,
e.g
On my wanted list is:
Fifa 2005 (bound to be the best Fifa ever)
GTA San Andreas (You can't go wrong with the GTA series)
LMA Manager 2005 (i like these sort of games and this will be classic)
etc. etc. etc.
you get the idea.
Page:
I disagree, I have never seen a decent game from EA, the longest EA game lasted for 9 hours.
I totally disagree. They have brilliant games for the PS2, XBOX, Gamecube and the PC.
Wakka wrote:
> I think thatn EA are brilliant so if they put their mind to it then
> they can get up to Pro Evo standards.
I don't see how EA are brilliant. The majority of their games are sports titles, which have all been done before so not much innovation is really necessary. And then there's MOH, which they're gradually ruining, James Bond games, which they've never made well anyway, and SSX, which seems to have lost it after Tricky.
Basically EA don't do much new stuff, and when they do, it tends to be cack. Licensing makes them money; not decent games.
> I think thatn EA are brilliant so if they put their mind to it then
> they can get up to Pro Evo standards.
I don't see how EA are brilliant. The majority of their games are sports titles, which have all been done before so not much innovation is really necessary. And then there's MOH, which they're gradually ruining, James Bond games, which they've never made well anyway, and SSX, which seems to have lost it after Tricky.
Basically EA don't do much new stuff, and when they do, it tends to be cack. Licensing makes them money; not decent games.
Because FIFA Football 2004 is crap compared to Pre Evolution Soccer 3.
Because FIFA is terrible for dribbling, shooting, passing and set pieces. Basically every feature a football game needs.
How come?
Bagz wrote:
> So do you think that Fifa is no where near as good as good PES
>
> i think that it is quite close, better with real names
It is no where near as close.
> So do you think that Fifa is no where near as good as good PES
>
> i think that it is quite close, better with real names
It is no where near as close.
MGS3,ff12 and gt4.
So do you think that Fifa is no where near as good as good PES
i think that it is quite close, better with real names
i think that it is quite close, better with real names
I think thatn EA are brilliant so if they put their mind to it then they can get up to Pro Evo standards.
Page: