The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
So he thinks he can hype up Nintendo and insult the competiton better than me does he?
He thinks he can claim the brilliance of DS better than I can?
He thinks his speech was good? Damn he made David Gossan look good.
I tell you I should work in Nintendo PR.... ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You all agree? Right?
He thinks he can claim the brilliance of DS better than I can?
He thinks his speech was good? Damn he made David Gossan look good.
I tell you I should work in Nintendo PR.... ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You all agree? Right?
Page:
So he thinks he can hype up Nintendo and insult the competiton better than me does he?
He thinks he can claim the brilliance of DS better than I can?
He thinks his speech was good? Damn he made David Gossan look good.
I tell you I should work in Nintendo PR.... ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You all agree? Right?
He thinks he can claim the brilliance of DS better than I can?
He thinks his speech was good? Damn he made David Gossan look good.
I tell you I should work in Nintendo PR.... ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You all agree? Right?
If you say so...
You've probably been responsible for 60% of teh GC's sales already, Dringo
That was harsh . . .
[URL]http://www.sparesomechange.com/funny/achieve.asp?name=Dringo&text=You+have+won+this+award+for+being+a+thousand+times+better+than+Reggie.+I+remove+my+several+hats+to+you+sir.[/URL]
Dringo wrote:
> He thinks his speech was good? Damn he made David Gossan look good.
*Go-sen.
Most.Pointless.Topic.Ever.
But if you really like Reggie, see my wonderful thread on him, folks!!
> He thinks his speech was good? Damn he made David Gossan look good.
*Go-sen.
Most.Pointless.Topic.Ever.
But if you really like Reggie, see my wonderful thread on him, folks!!
No, because you can't come up with a better reason for anything I say other than "thousands of people I don't know say I'm right, even though I've never actually spoken to any of them".
;)
Nintendo's PR department would be much better of without you.
Take an example :D
When asked if Resident Evil 4 is the absolute best quality the Gamecube has to offer, Dringo from Nintyville responds, yes, it's playable the way it is, so that's good enough for you lot.
When the real answer should have been, the game is still in early stages of development, but the franchise deserves a ligthing system which will give you nightmares, much better :) Then again, maybe Capcom should just make it for the Xbox, surely iD would give them a hand with some decent looking lighting and let Nintendo argue over which shade of pink is better suited to their next console.
;)
Nintendo's PR department would be much better of without you.
Take an example :D
When asked if Resident Evil 4 is the absolute best quality the Gamecube has to offer, Dringo from Nintyville responds, yes, it's playable the way it is, so that's good enough for you lot.
When the real answer should have been, the game is still in early stages of development, but the franchise deserves a ligthing system which will give you nightmares, much better :) Then again, maybe Capcom should just make it for the Xbox, surely iD would give them a hand with some decent looking lighting and let Nintendo argue over which shade of pink is better suited to their next console.
Dringo's response would be the same as Capcom's:
The level of detail on the scenery is almost identical to that of our pre-rendered games, the new 3D landscapes add a sense of reality to the situation and the character models are the best thing the Gamecube has ever seen.
If, which I doubt, you are correct about the lighting problem... especially as you're the only one to mention it... then i'd simply ignore it.
All my arguments, as blatenty nintified as they are, all have some basis I'm not some fanboy that just makes crap up.
The level of detail on the scenery is almost identical to that of our pre-rendered games, the new 3D landscapes add a sense of reality to the situation and the character models are the best thing the Gamecube has ever seen.
If, which I doubt, you are correct about the lighting problem... especially as you're the only one to mention it... then i'd simply ignore it.
All my arguments, as blatenty nintified as they are, all have some basis I'm not some fanboy that just makes crap up.
Bonus wrote:
> Then again, maybe
> Capcom should just make it for the Xbox, surely iD would give them a
> hand with some decent looking lighting and let Nintendo argue over
> which shade of pink is better suited to their next console.
Stupid jerk.... Capcom wants to earn some money in Japan too you mong! And when it comes to the graphics, I think that the graphics of RE4 is way ahead of the majority of the xbox games.
> Then again, maybe
> Capcom should just make it for the Xbox, surely iD would give them a
> hand with some decent looking lighting and let Nintendo argue over
> which shade of pink is better suited to their next console.
Stupid jerk.... Capcom wants to earn some money in Japan too you mong! And when it comes to the graphics, I think that the graphics of RE4 is way ahead of the majority of the xbox games.
leflus wrote:
> I think that the graphics of
> RE4 is way ahead of the majority of the xbox games.
Well, when you can think, and explain what makes you think this, I might consider coming back to talk to you. Fed up getting itno discussions with people who say, I think, no proof or structured arguement, but I think.
If you are capable of explaining why the graphics of RE4 are so good, then it might be worth talking about :D
I know why I think they are good, I also know why I think they could be a lot better.
I have never said the graphics were bad, just that they could be better, so tell me why that opinion is so difficult for people to take on board.
Then again, I'll alwyas think that the graphics of any game could be better, but I'll say this until I am blue in the face, RE4 would be a much more atmospheric game with a better lighting system.
If anyone wants to be constructivly critical of that statement, feel free to add an opinion.
Anyone just wanting to hit out with a "Bonus, you're wrong and nothing could ever look better comment", you will be wasting your time, I'll prove you wrong time and time again.
> I think that the graphics of
> RE4 is way ahead of the majority of the xbox games.
Well, when you can think, and explain what makes you think this, I might consider coming back to talk to you. Fed up getting itno discussions with people who say, I think, no proof or structured arguement, but I think.
If you are capable of explaining why the graphics of RE4 are so good, then it might be worth talking about :D
I know why I think they are good, I also know why I think they could be a lot better.
I have never said the graphics were bad, just that they could be better, so tell me why that opinion is so difficult for people to take on board.
Then again, I'll alwyas think that the graphics of any game could be better, but I'll say this until I am blue in the face, RE4 would be a much more atmospheric game with a better lighting system.
If anyone wants to be constructivly critical of that statement, feel free to add an opinion.
Anyone just wanting to hit out with a "Bonus, you're wrong and nothing could ever look better comment", you will be wasting your time, I'll prove you wrong time and time again.
Page: