The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
These gamers are sad cases. They can be PC gamers who spend most of their time using ‘mods’ to create levels based on other games, or those who tweak their games ever so slightly to make it more hardcore. Some get so obsessed that they start their own forums specifically about these games and start ‘pwning’ people when they can’t play as well.
Then there are those who worry too much about their scores. Sure, Xbox Live and the various other online services allow you to compete in games. But what’s the point in being the best at a game? After all, it just means you’ve got a high score on a database until it either gets deleted or someone beats it. Scoring well on games can be a fun process, but getting self obsessed and dedicating yourself to beat scores, build up a rank or beat your own time by a nano-second is quite ridiculous. You’re only doing it to benefit yourself and it is quite possible that no one else really cares. Wow! So you got so many points, medal?
You could argue that it gives a person something to aim for, a goal. But there’s a difference between trying hard and cry-baby obsession. For example, the person who leaves a game, such as Splinter Cell Pandora Tomorrow, before the results screen loads so that they don’t lose points. Why bother? If you can’t take losing, then why play? But what’s worse is the person who then doesn’t gain the points because of that other person leaving. So you play for the points now? You play merely to gain a digital number? If you want an increasing digital number, buy yourself an electronic calendar!
Then there’s the antisocial gamer. “You haven’t played this game for 200 hours and got a super high score!” That sentence is often followed by a kicking of that player who only wanted to play for a little fun. It would be different if there were other factors involved, but that reason alone is why so many people tend to start disliking their onlines games and is why opinions on PC online gaming vary so much. Think of it logically. How can that person increase their abilities if no one will give them the chance?
I admit, I have an obsession with videogames. I’ve been a semi-fanboy of Nintendo’s for around fifteen years now and I have all the major formats currently on the market. I play games a lot and I spend a lot of time here on the UKchatforums board. I am a serious gamer, I wont deny that, but I don’t let myself get obsessed with stats or beating other people (especially those I only know from the internet). Sure, I’m disappointed if I lose, but I give it another go or do something else.
I play entirely for fun. That’s why I find the majority of the stealthy games aren’t for me, and why games such as Rallisport Challenge 2, The Legend of Zelda, Super Mario, Halo and the many other games I play are. I couldn’t give a monkeys if I lose a point, I couldn’t give a monkeys if my stats lower, and if my memory cards were deleted, sure I’d be disappointed, but I wouldn’t worry about it too much.
I’m just surprised that some gamers take things way too seriously. After all, it’s not real. It is a bunch of three-dimensional computer images and two-dimensional sprites interacting with other three-dimensional and two-dimensional ‘objects’. It would be different if it really mattered. Gaming should be about the fun. Not purely about the numbers. If you take gaming too seriously, you need help.
For one, the serial TK-ers would be turned on by the rest of the team and it would be fantastically fun.
HEADSHOT
HEADSHOT
MMMMOOONNNSSTEERRR KILLLL!
Camping in Unreal Tournie is the most fun thing ever, but the amount of abuse you get for "cheating" is beyong belief.
If camping hadn't been intended in the Morpheus - Facing Worlds levels, then why is it that Sniper Rifles arelocated at the top of the buildings?
Of course, I can't be bothered camping, because of the abuse, but I will go up and stop somebodies "godlike" killing spree, just ebcause they suck, and I rock.
> Strafio wrote:
> Double post - happens.
> Tripple post - clumsy, but again possible...
>
> Quadruple post? Oh dear! :-Dq
>
> That's nothing, I just 'read' all those posts of yours, without
> realising they were all the same...
I read about three. Then realised that they looked familiar.
I don't like it when people look down on gamers, thinking they actually have a problem. It's not a problem, or a dilemma, it's what they like and it's what entertains them. They don't see spending time on their PC as a shameful thing.
> These gamers are sad cases. They can be PC gamers who spend most of
> their time using ‘mods’ to create levels based on other games, or
> those who tweak their games ever so slightly to make it more
> hardcore.
I sort of disagree with this bit though.
Anything creative is cool.
It's achne elitism that's sad. :-)
"Ask Goatboy to restart the UK Dentists!"
I was in that for a bit, it was great fun, Operation Flashpoint :D. The very first game I played with them, we all bundled into a helicopter, flew off to land near the enemy, but the pilot managed to turn the helicopter over during the flight and killed us all.
Then we got in trucks and tried to smash into each other, which all blew up. It really was great fun... I wasn't in it long though, my connection sucked ass and I came into it late too, so was hard to er, inflitrate.
But if you can get yourself a completely non-serious clan, go for it, it's great fun.