The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/chroniclesofriddick/review.html[/URL]
Page:
Cyclone wrote:
> Stop being annoying.
Takes one to know one.
> Stop being annoying.
Takes one to know one.
Stop being annoying. It's lame that the game is relatively short and has no multiplayer mode. That does not mean I think the game is going to be rubbish, far from it.
Cyclone wrote:
> Except short and no multi mode. lame.
So you've played and completed it, I suppose?
> Except short and no multi mode. lame.
So you've played and completed it, I suppose?
I ain't seen any clips, just screenshots - which looked a little 'average' in places.
This caught my eye a while ago, but I lost interest. Now I'm back into it and anticipating it's release.
Makes a nice change to have a movie tie-in game that is actually good.
This caught my eye a while ago, but I lost interest. Now I'm back into it and anticipating it's release.
Makes a nice change to have a movie tie-in game that is actually good.
Except short and no multi mode. lame.
Have you seen any video clips of this - it looks fricking awesome! Some of the best graphics and textures I've ever seen, and it's like a sneaky FPS, so it must be good.
Alastair's ordered a Yank copy of the game. He should be posting his views when he's played it.
9.3? It must be good then.
9.3? It must be good then.
[URL]http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/chroniclesofriddick/review.html[/URL]
Page: