The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Dear Mr.Hacker,
PLease could you hack wldnas, and in doing so, prevent him from being able to post here. I would really appreciate it.
Thanks,
Chipseh.
Ps. Saw this and thought of you: [URL]http://alldunn.com/robin/images/hacker.gif[/URL]
PLease could you hack wldnas, and in doing so, prevent him from being able to post here. I would really appreciate it.
Thanks,
Chipseh.
Ps. Saw this and thought of you: [URL]http://alldunn.com/robin/images/hacker.gif[/URL]
Page:
Solskjær wrote:
> It's like dealing with a 'Bully', or even a Townie... The more you
> fight or argue-back; the more of a "response" to their
> movement you make, the more fuel you'll be feeding them to keep on
> replying.
Haha, you don't even need to do anything to make a townie start on you. As revealed by the fun incident last summer where I got my nose broken for walking down a street in broad daylight.
> It's like dealing with a 'Bully', or even a Townie... The more you
> fight or argue-back; the more of a "response" to their
> movement you make, the more fuel you'll be feeding them to keep on
> replying.
Haha, you don't even need to do anything to make a townie start on you. As revealed by the fun incident last summer where I got my nose broken for walking down a street in broad daylight.
Yes, like Dringo said - just ignore them and they'll go away.
It's like dealing with a 'Bully', or even a Townie... The more you fight or argue-back; the more of a "response" to their movement you make, the more fuel you'll be feeding them to keep on replying.
It's all done for attention, you see.
It's like dealing with a 'Bully', or even a Townie... The more you fight or argue-back; the more of a "response" to their movement you make, the more fuel you'll be feeding them to keep on replying.
It's all done for attention, you see.
Just ignore the JAT's and they'll either go away or continue wasting their precious little lives.
why so abusive Jason?
So many posts to report, so little time.
Sorry, even pure evil characters (LORL, as Nathan might say) like me go make tea.
Good luck contacting Vince...
Sara is well aware of the situation however, so aware infact to be already involved. And as for Frank, well it goes without saying. He has a certain soft spot for you, always has.
Good luck contacting Vince...
Sara is well aware of the situation however, so aware infact to be already involved. And as for Frank, well it goes without saying. He has a certain soft spot for you, always has.
Seemed a little pointed to be merely "telling me otherwise", but I will let it drop, Microchips. It was a joke, but a dangerous one if you consider the repercussions it may have.
Wldnas you have never been, and never will be, anything like me.
Wldnas you have never been, and never will be, anything like me.
I'm not defending any argument, you wrongly accused the fact that you had struck a nerve, and I was telling you otherwise... and besides, if you read what I said in reply to your first post, this is a cheesy joke in anycase.
Microchips wrote:
> Haha, hardly... it was such a poorly organised 'argument' that I had
> to re-read your poor grammar to get the jist of what you were
> saying...
So... why keep defending your arguement. I was merely passing comment, try not to be so hasty. You might offend someone.
Oh and "Banger King Wldnas", (indeed how clever), I'd hardly call it Dirty .
> Haha, hardly... it was such a poorly organised 'argument' that I had
> to re-read your poor grammar to get the jist of what you were
> saying...
So... why keep defending your arguement. I was merely passing comment, try not to be so hasty. You might offend someone.
Oh and "Banger King Wldnas", (indeed how clever), I'd hardly call it Dirty .
Haha, hardly... it was such a poorly organised 'argument' that I had to re-read your poor grammar to get the jist of what you were saying...
Page: