Viewing Thread:
"Metal Gear VS Splinter Cell"

I...again...can't choose, anyone else want to choose for me?

I...again...can't choose, anyone else want to choose for me?

Metal Gear Solid.

Easy.

I prefer splinter cell.

if you want proper stealth get splinter cell.
If you want better gadgets, get splinter cell.
If you want a challenge get splinter cell.
If you want a decent control system, get splinter cell.
If you want decent graphics get splinter cell.
If you want xbox live support get splinter cell.



If you want poor AI, long boring cut scenes that break up the action, poor camera angles and card board boxe action, Buy metal gear solid.

Splinter Cell easily.

If you want absolute garbage, listen to spoonbeast.

Wasn't going to post in here, but that had to be pointed out.

Both are completely different games. In my opinion:

1. MGS1
2. SC1
3. MGS2
4. SC2

If you want absoloute garbage, buy Metal Gear Solid.

Mav wrote:
> If you want absolute garbage, listen to spoonbeast.

I especially liked the "if you want a challenge get Splinter Cell" comment. They are both mind numblingly easy to the point of being a joke.

Without a doubt Metal Gear however Splinter Cell 3 is looking decent, I just hope they can manage to string a decent, challenging and worth while single player campaign together now as both have been lacking this so far.

If we are narrowing it down to one game, Twin Snakes urinates on both Splinter Cell games from a great height. Online Splinter Cell is excellent but the single player is guff.

Twin Snakes is both action and/OR stealth, depending on what you want to do. People are such morons when they say 'it's not stealthy enough!!!11' - If they tried, it is. And SC just sucks in the action bits, whereas MGS excels.

Both. Pandora Tommorrow online is class.