Viewing Thread:
"Sudeki"

Got 6/10 on Gamecentral.



+ Gorgeous
+ Excellent combat
+ Decent music

- Boring outside of combat. As in really dull.
- Poor voice acting
- Not an 'epic' RPG (flaw in my opinion anyway)

IGn - 7.8/10
1UP - 5.5/10
TeamXbox - 7.9/10

etc.

Hoo.

Hedfix wrote:
> Brute Force was excellent, just needed some gameplay to finish it
> off.


Had to be done.

Brute Force was excellent, just needed some online play to finish it off.

I doubt Sudeki has co-op (does it? If so it's gone up in my 'to get' list already) or gorgeous Sniping.

Not in game style, in actual finished results.

I.e, looked mighty promising, but turned out to be pretty average, a love-hate game.

Cyclone wrote:
>
> From what I can tell, it's a Brute Force-esque RPG.

Strange but intrigueing... (sp?)

I was hoping it'd be great, but it sounds as if TOS more than makes up for this deficiency.

From what I can tell, it's a Brute Force-esque RPG.

*Runs in*

Halo 2!! ;D

*Dies*

Having Said that Shadow Ops Red Mercury was given bad reviews by all but OXM, and I still like the game. It's ridden with flaws - especially the graphics, but I enjoy it, so the same will probably be true of Sudeki for many people - they'll find something they like in it and latch onto it whilst ignoring the negatives. You just know that Kameo and Fable are also going to be "okay but not great" games *sigh*

I think it looks great but its not my sort of RPG, the demo on OXM was ok but like i said, not for me.

I'm not impressed with how it looks. The character concept is drab - one can jump high! the other can use magic! another can say the alphabet backwards whilst drinking a glass of water!

It sounds trash. It probably is trash. Meh.

Great, another RPG down the pan.

I dread to think how bad Fable could turn out after something with this much potential got screwed.