The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Doom 3'.
the PC version on Doom3 has been leaked over the net. dont know if you guys know this.
i havent got it but have played it at a friends house.
he had the settings turned down, and it looks great, it feels great, and its really not as scary as people are saying.
really when something jumps out at you, you just jump and then laugh as you shotguhn off its head.
its put me in a great mood for the xbox version.
i havent got it but have played it at a friends house.
he had the settings turned down, and it looks great, it feels great, and its really not as scary as people are saying.
really when something jumps out at you, you just jump and then laugh as you shotguhn off its head.
its put me in a great mood for the xbox version.
Page:
You are a company director and you dont buy music?
Thats just being a tight-ass.
Thats just being a tight-ass.
Gar-J wrote:
It's all part of living in a democracy,
AHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I live in a democracy, that means it's okay to steal if I want to!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Now everyone knows you have no credability and we can safely ignore your little drivel.
It's all part of living in a democracy,
AHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I live in a democracy, that means it's okay to steal if I want to!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Now everyone knows you have no credability and we can safely ignore your little drivel.
gamesfreak wrote:
> Do you download music/games WS?
>
> Just a question, I'm not inciting an arguement or anything.
No I don't.
Sometimes someone tells me to check out a band, and if I can't borrow a CD I download a few tracks. If I like them a buy the album, if I don't I delete them.
> Do you download music/games WS?
>
> Just a question, I'm not inciting an arguement or anything.
No I don't.
Sometimes someone tells me to check out a band, and if I can't borrow a CD I download a few tracks. If I like them a buy the album, if I don't I delete them.
Whitestripes DX wrote:
> Okay, clearly you're just another Bell.
>
> There's no way to argue with you because you're just too stupid to
> comprehend anything other than what your dull little brain tells
> you.
You mean you and Bell aren't the same person? Jesus, what with you both being such morons I was convinced he was your alter-ego.
There's no way to argue with me because I'm right and you're wrong. We live in a democracy and if I want to download mp3s then I can. If I get caught then on my head be it. If you want to sit there with your thumb up your @rse pretending to be a fecking saint, then sure, you're free to do so. It's all part of living in a democracy, so just get out of my face you peasant and go and get run over or something.
> You go on doing what you're doing, I just hope one day someone breaks
> into your home while you're away and steals everything you own.
They'd have to be stealing from me all week with an army of HGVs.
> I can get any material object for free, does that mean I should even
> though it's breaking the law? According to you it does.
I can't be arsed to create more metaphors for your tiny brain to digest, sorry. Ask your mother.
> And I hope people refuse to pay for your work because they can get it for
> free.
If you can find a company director and network administrator that works for free, send me his number.
> Okay, clearly you're just another Bell.
>
> There's no way to argue with you because you're just too stupid to
> comprehend anything other than what your dull little brain tells
> you.
You mean you and Bell aren't the same person? Jesus, what with you both being such morons I was convinced he was your alter-ego.
There's no way to argue with me because I'm right and you're wrong. We live in a democracy and if I want to download mp3s then I can. If I get caught then on my head be it. If you want to sit there with your thumb up your @rse pretending to be a fecking saint, then sure, you're free to do so. It's all part of living in a democracy, so just get out of my face you peasant and go and get run over or something.
> You go on doing what you're doing, I just hope one day someone breaks
> into your home while you're away and steals everything you own.
They'd have to be stealing from me all week with an army of HGVs.
> I can get any material object for free, does that mean I should even
> though it's breaking the law? According to you it does.
I can't be arsed to create more metaphors for your tiny brain to digest, sorry. Ask your mother.
> And I hope people refuse to pay for your work because they can get it for
> free.
If you can find a company director and network administrator that works for free, send me his number.
Gar-J wrote:
> Aoe wrote:
> I was just saying how it isn't technically stealing, but still
> against the law.
>
> For like the 10th time, I know it is. So? I came here and said we're
> all free to do whatever we want, whatever anyone else thinks about
> it. This isn't Nazi Germany you know.
I'm not critising you for downloading music, im just saying that it's not stealing! I couldn't care less if you've downloaded every song ever to be released.
> 2. Again, bringing irrelevant aspects into the conversation isn't
> going to help matters. Whether writing a song is difficult or not is
> irrelevant - the cost of music is still much too high and the
> industry was taking advantage of people's love of music. I don't
> mind
> paying for anything if it's an honest cost, but I'm not going to be
> ripped off.
>
> Hoho. Alot of music is indeed a ripoff, and for the real bands
> £10 is fair for an album.
>
> You think the band gets that money? So I guess the record company is
> a not-for-proffit organisation?
Sure they make profit, but then, how else would bands be heard? Mp3s off the web? But how would they be paid? They wouldn't. They're necesary, and although they take more than they should, if they charged less, they'd still take out the same amount. Something we (we being people that do buy music... i don't, i'm skint) have to live with.
> 3. Go and ask Noel Gallagher if he feels out of pocket with his
> various homes, dozens of cars and 80 million in the bank.
>
> I shall. Somehow i doubt he does feel out of pocket though. What's
> that got to do with anything? He just happend to be tallented, and
> people liked the music.
>
> The point was this - you keep making out that mp3 downloads are evil
> and leaving the poor little musician scraping for a living, feeding
> from bins and begging for clothes. Fact is, it makes very little
> difference.
Sorry if it seems that way. But i'm not.
> Aoe wrote:
> I was just saying how it isn't technically stealing, but still
> against the law.
>
> For like the 10th time, I know it is. So? I came here and said we're
> all free to do whatever we want, whatever anyone else thinks about
> it. This isn't Nazi Germany you know.
I'm not critising you for downloading music, im just saying that it's not stealing! I couldn't care less if you've downloaded every song ever to be released.
> 2. Again, bringing irrelevant aspects into the conversation isn't
> going to help matters. Whether writing a song is difficult or not is
> irrelevant - the cost of music is still much too high and the
> industry was taking advantage of people's love of music. I don't
> mind
> paying for anything if it's an honest cost, but I'm not going to be
> ripped off.
>
> Hoho. Alot of music is indeed a ripoff, and for the real bands
> £10 is fair for an album.
>
> You think the band gets that money? So I guess the record company is
> a not-for-proffit organisation?
Sure they make profit, but then, how else would bands be heard? Mp3s off the web? But how would they be paid? They wouldn't. They're necesary, and although they take more than they should, if they charged less, they'd still take out the same amount. Something we (we being people that do buy music... i don't, i'm skint) have to live with.
> 3. Go and ask Noel Gallagher if he feels out of pocket with his
> various homes, dozens of cars and 80 million in the bank.
>
> I shall. Somehow i doubt he does feel out of pocket though. What's
> that got to do with anything? He just happend to be tallented, and
> people liked the music.
>
> The point was this - you keep making out that mp3 downloads are evil
> and leaving the poor little musician scraping for a living, feeding
> from bins and begging for clothes. Fact is, it makes very little
> difference.
Sorry if it seems that way. But i'm not.
Cant we all just GET ALONG!!!
Do you download music/games WS?
Just a question, I'm not inciting an arguement or anything.
Just a question, I'm not inciting an arguement or anything.
Gar-J wrote:
> Whitestripes DX wrote:
> Now imagine all those bands doing their work; writing songs,
> recording them, producing them etc. And thanks to you they aren't
> getting their money for their work.
>
> Once again, making stuff up.
Yeah...Because that doesnt really happen...
> Whitestripes DX wrote:
> Now imagine all those bands doing their work; writing songs,
> recording them, producing them etc. And thanks to you they aren't
> getting their money for their work.
>
> Once again, making stuff up.
Yeah...Because that doesnt really happen...
Aoe wrote:
> I was just saying how it isn't technically stealing, but still
> against the law.
For like the 10th time, I know it is. So? I came here and said we're all free to do whatever we want, whatever anyone else thinks about it. This isn't Nazi Germany you know.
> 2. Again, bringing irrelevant aspects into the conversation isn't
> going to help matters. Whether writing a song is difficult or not is
> irrelevant - the cost of music is still much too high and the
> industry was taking advantage of people's love of music. I don't
> mind
> paying for anything if it's an honest cost, but I'm not going to be
> ripped off.
>
> Hoho. Alot of music is indeed a ripoff, and for the real bands
> £10 is fair for an album.
You think the band gets that money? So I guess the record company is a not-for-proffit organisation?
> 3. Go and ask Noel Gallagher if he feels out of pocket with his
> various homes, dozens of cars and 80 million in the bank.
>
> I shall. Somehow i doubt he does feel out of pocket though. What's
> that got to do with anything? He just happend to be tallented, and
> people liked the music.
The point was this - you keep making out that mp3 downloads are evil and leaving the poor little musician scraping for a living, feeding from bins and begging for clothes. Fact is, it makes very little difference.
> I was just saying how it isn't technically stealing, but still
> against the law.
For like the 10th time, I know it is. So? I came here and said we're all free to do whatever we want, whatever anyone else thinks about it. This isn't Nazi Germany you know.
> 2. Again, bringing irrelevant aspects into the conversation isn't
> going to help matters. Whether writing a song is difficult or not is
> irrelevant - the cost of music is still much too high and the
> industry was taking advantage of people's love of music. I don't
> mind
> paying for anything if it's an honest cost, but I'm not going to be
> ripped off.
>
> Hoho. Alot of music is indeed a ripoff, and for the real bands
> £10 is fair for an album.
You think the band gets that money? So I guess the record company is a not-for-proffit organisation?
> 3. Go and ask Noel Gallagher if he feels out of pocket with his
> various homes, dozens of cars and 80 million in the bank.
>
> I shall. Somehow i doubt he does feel out of pocket though. What's
> that got to do with anything? He just happend to be tallented, and
> people liked the music.
The point was this - you keep making out that mp3 downloads are evil and leaving the poor little musician scraping for a living, feeding from bins and begging for clothes. Fact is, it makes very little difference.
Belldandy wrote:
> Gar-J wrote:
> Guy buys music;
> Guy doesn't like price of music;
> Guy downloads music for free;
> Music industry makes prices cheaper to try an get guys like this
> back;
>
> *reality check*
>
> Music industry thinks "we have tons of cash and damn good
> lawyers, let's target those who do this and whack them with fines so
> large that,as has happened several times already in the US from our
> previous action, people have had to sell homes".
To quote you, *reality check*
That happens to people who trade in thousands and thousands of songs over a period of time. I get what I want anonymously (and no I don't use kazaa) and then leave. I don't act as a gateway for mp3 piracy - I don't have the connection for it for a start.
Why don't you try pinning world terrorism on me while you're at it?
> Gar-J wrote:
> Guy buys music;
> Guy doesn't like price of music;
> Guy downloads music for free;
> Music industry makes prices cheaper to try an get guys like this
> back;
>
> *reality check*
>
> Music industry thinks "we have tons of cash and damn good
> lawyers, let's target those who do this and whack them with fines so
> large that,as has happened several times already in the US from our
> previous action, people have had to sell homes".
To quote you, *reality check*
That happens to people who trade in thousands and thousands of songs over a period of time. I get what I want anonymously (and no I don't use kazaa) and then leave. I don't act as a gateway for mp3 piracy - I don't have the connection for it for a start.
Why don't you try pinning world terrorism on me while you're at it?
Page: