The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
You might think I'm a bit mad, but it seems that whenever a good game comes along, nobody dares try to imitate it. There are loads of games that imitate Quake, but very few that make any impression onto Half-Life.
Undoubtably, no developer will dare try and clone something like Black and White, because they know that their clone will be far inferior.
Take the Final Fantasy series. Some of the most successful games of all time. Yet there are only a handful of games, all of them on consoles that make imitations. Despite this, there are hundreds of platformers, FPS games, and RTS's around, all of them the same, as well as bog-standard PC style RPG's.
Why is it that, as well as blatently making games that have been seen countless times before, so many developers insist on making them the same as other games that were pretty bad to begin with?
The answer, most probably, is that they know they can compete with the bad games. Trying to make a FF or B&W clone will almost certainly mean that the game is inferior, so why bother?
I wouldn't mind playing cloned games if they were actually decent, but it seems that nobody is able to make a good game these days. When one does come along, it is a profound and new event. Which I think is a real shame.
See Ya
PinkPig
Undoubtably, no developer will dare try and clone something like Black and White, because they know that their clone will be far inferior.
Take the Final Fantasy series. Some of the most successful games of all time. Yet there are only a handful of games, all of them on consoles that make imitations. Despite this, there are hundreds of platformers, FPS games, and RTS's around, all of them the same, as well as bog-standard PC style RPG's.
Why is it that, as well as blatently making games that have been seen countless times before, so many developers insist on making them the same as other games that were pretty bad to begin with?
The answer, most probably, is that they know they can compete with the bad games. Trying to make a FF or B&W clone will almost certainly mean that the game is inferior, so why bother?
I wouldn't mind playing cloned games if they were actually decent, but it seems that nobody is able to make a good game these days. When one does come along, it is a profound and new event. Which I think is a real shame.
See Ya
PinkPig
Page:
There's no harm in stating the obvious, is there?
Emperor: Battle for Dune is supposed to be much better than Dune 2000. Then again, I think it is just another remake of C&C with a few flashy graphics
Are you going to get Dune 3.
Initially I was sceptical, but then my friend convinced me to get it, and I'm not complaining now!
>Red Alert 2 is the best RTS ever created.
Is it? I've never played any of the C&C games - I'm not sure why, but I've played just about every other well-known PC RTS, but not this. I've never liked the look of all those tanks. So is the game any good? I mean in terms of fun gamplay.
See Ya
PinkPig
Is it? I've never played any of the C&C games - I'm not sure why, but I've played just about every other well-known PC RTS, but not this. I've never liked the look of all those tanks. So is the game any good? I mean in terms of fun gamplay.
See Ya
PinkPig
I have a Voodoo 5 5000.
Yes, it rocks.
Yes, it rocks.
Red Alert 2 was good but I can't wait to get Emperor: Battle For Dune. I need a new graphics card first but then the ultimate gaming experience will start. Okay, not the ultimate, but pretty damn good.
Red Alert 2 is the best RTS ever created.
Dune was good though, I used to play it loads on my school's Acorn.
Dune was good though, I used to play it loads on my school's Acorn.
Page: