The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Is it really worth getting a network adapter? I'm thinking of getting one but I don't know if it's any good, can anyone tell me if it's worth the money?
Page:
Burnt wrote:
> Halo, Project Gotham 2, Rainbow Six 3, i'll let some else do the
> rest...
>
> EDIT : Ninja Gaiden
Timesplitters>Halo
NFSU>Project Gotham
MGS>RS3
Ninja Gaiden is the biggest rip-off i've ever heard of.
How can you have a gotham game without batman.
> Halo, Project Gotham 2, Rainbow Six 3, i'll let some else do the
> rest...
>
> EDIT : Ninja Gaiden
Timesplitters>Halo
NFSU>Project Gotham
MGS>RS3
Ninja Gaiden is the biggest rip-off i've ever heard of.
How can you have a gotham game without batman.
Halo, Project Gotham 2, Rainbow Six 3, i'll let some else do the rest...
EDIT : Ninja Gaiden
EDIT : Ninja Gaiden
Name one good XBOX exclusive game.
Your so tied up in your PS2 fantasies that you cant even tell whats good from bad.
You have obviosly never had a Xbox and thats why you dont like it.
You have obviosly never had a Xbox and thats why you dont like it.
Eh?
Ha!
I feel for you my man...
I feel for you my man...
That's because PS2 focuses on making good games rather than making online half decent. XBox live is good in comparison to the XBox games because XBox is so damn bad.
gr13ve wrote:
> Youn could say xbox live will do the same but what would you rather
> have (assuming you also have an xbox) ps2 online with a one off cost
> for network adapter (£16.99) (with the exeption of Everquest
> online which you get charged to play) plus your broadband charge
> monthly or would you prefer xbox live which costs £36.99 for a
> starter pack and after the first year you have to pay £39.99 a
> year to play and then you also have to pay for broadband.
The thing is though that PS2 online is really badly set-up. Xbox Live is far superior in the way it's run, you might have to pay a little extra but you really do get quality and it's totally worth the £40 a year fee (£20 really as you get a headset with the starter kit).
Then when you compare the amount of quality online games out and coming out on Xbox Live with the laughable PS2 line-up, there really is no comparisson. It'd be like saying my Atari ST is better than your PS2 because it's a few pounds cheaper.
> Youn could say xbox live will do the same but what would you rather
> have (assuming you also have an xbox) ps2 online with a one off cost
> for network adapter (£16.99) (with the exeption of Everquest
> online which you get charged to play) plus your broadband charge
> monthly or would you prefer xbox live which costs £36.99 for a
> starter pack and after the first year you have to pay £39.99 a
> year to play and then you also have to pay for broadband.
The thing is though that PS2 online is really badly set-up. Xbox Live is far superior in the way it's run, you might have to pay a little extra but you really do get quality and it's totally worth the £40 a year fee (£20 really as you get a headset with the starter kit).
Then when you compare the amount of quality online games out and coming out on Xbox Live with the laughable PS2 line-up, there really is no comparisson. It'd be like saying my Atari ST is better than your PS2 because it's a few pounds cheaper.
I'm getting my PS2 online on the 21st!
Whooo!
Roll on SOCOM 2!
I'll probably be called Stridman.
Whooo!
Roll on SOCOM 2!
I'll probably be called Stridman.
UNITEDLEGENDS159 wrote:
> i really wanted that, but i need a cable connection which i dont have
> and i need £50
Lifes a bummer, i aint met one person yet who can get the deal.
> i really wanted that, but i need a cable connection which i dont have
> and i need £50
Lifes a bummer, i aint met one person yet who can get the deal.
Page: