The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I just saw a video clip of Duke Nukem Forever from...**whoops better not say which magazine**...The graphics do look good yet in some bits they seem "blocky" but overall I am not overly impressed with this game. I thought Duke 3D was superb for its time and is still quite fun and playable (but only on multiplayer mode). Is anyone actually looking forward to this games release?
Another point is that, how annoying is it when a game is postponed and postponed and when it finally is released it is either utter pants or everyone has just forgotten about it. One game of course which defied this logic was Black & White (go on go write something in the Black & White forum in the games bit). Usually these games which are delayed are still heavily bugged and require patches to correct these bugs (sometimes it requires several patches and other times none or most of the bugs aren't even fixed)
Has anyone found this about there games which they have spent there hard earned cash on and been majorly disappointed?
(Is this topic just something to keep me busy until the takeaway arrives?? 14th June. You Decide!)
Another point is that, how annoying is it when a game is postponed and postponed and when it finally is released it is either utter pants or everyone has just forgotten about it. One game of course which defied this logic was Black & White (go on go write something in the Black & White forum in the games bit). Usually these games which are delayed are still heavily bugged and require patches to correct these bugs (sometimes it requires several patches and other times none or most of the bugs aren't even fixed)
Has anyone found this about there games which they have spent there hard earned cash on and been majorly disappointed?
(Is this topic just something to keep me busy until the takeaway arrives?? 14th June. You Decide!)
Page:
mcg_highlander wrote:
> BTW, why isn't Turbonutter a notable, he is one of the longest
> serving members on this forum, is he not??
I've been here for a lot longer than it says on my stats (my old accounts mucked up) so does that mean I should be a notable?
Nope cos I'm not bothered whether I am or aren't and I wasn't voted as one!
> BTW, why isn't Turbonutter a notable, he is one of the longest
> serving members on this forum, is he not??
I've been here for a lot longer than it says on my stats (my old accounts mucked up) so does that mean I should be a notable?
Nope cos I'm not bothered whether I am or aren't and I wasn't voted as one!
I can't forgive, can't forget, can't understand what went wrong, 'cause you said this was right, you clucked up my life...
I thought the graphics looked quite impressive.
When you take over Grix and kill him you may have his notable status, until then you'll have to make do with "ordinary" status
Whoops not chronologically, I meant physically
And he's not a Notable becuase hedidn't win the vote. And anyway, time doesn't earn you respect on here.
mcg_highlander wrote:
> BTW, why isn't Turbonutter a notable, he is one of the longest
> serving members on this forum, is he not??
Err... technically yes chronologically no.
> BTW, why isn't Turbonutter a notable, he is one of the longest
> serving members on this forum, is he not??
Err... technically yes chronologically no.
BTW, why isn't Turbonutter a notable, he is one of the longest serving members on this forum, is he not??
Page: