Viewing Thread:
"Is Spider II just winding us up?"

It's not often you will see me openly challenge the integrity of a member of the forums.

But Spider II is just too familiar with everything to be a newbie. He shows intelligent glimmers ocassionally, and then acts completely thick the next minute.

He had to sign up twice for some reason, remember he was Spider 2001 before, and he voted for two people under two separate names in the election.

So is he someone we know, who is deliberately winding us up?

jo

For my money...

(and since I'm neither Staff nor a notable, I think I can get away with saying this?)

but, for my money... SPider (in all his many profiles) is just CheatGuru muckking around...

He does pretty much the same kinda thing...

And it was when the first Spider (Spider2001?) turned up that Cheats started to appear less and less on the forum...

Now, I'm not intending to start a 'who is Spider' thing here...

(especially since I can blame GoatBoy for that (only j/k man :) ))

with everyone pointing fingers and starting a witchhunt...

(Unless theirs burning and Holy Grail references made... at which point, it might not be such a bad idea... we could have a BBQ and roast marshmellows?)

But as I say... for my tuppence worth, the Spiders are CheatGuru by any other name

:)

I'd like to point out that Spider isn't me.

I like funnies, but even I couldn't lower my brain enough to pretend to write the crap he comes out with.

I talk to him on msn and he seems fairly genuine and not really thick at all.

Tony wrote:
> We listen.

Some things we do, some we don't.

We will not give
> the power to alter or delete messages.

At some stage we might
> introduce a confirmation screen, so that you can check your message
> before posting it.

I was just saying that i suggested them first the rest of the post was just there to make it sound good

night all

seeya later/tomorrow/whenever

Tony wrote:
> We listen.

Some things we do, some we don't.

We will not give
> the power to alter or delete messages.

At some stage we might
> introduce a confirmation screen, so that you can check your message
> before posting it.


I don't think you should. But still, that's my opinion.

A few times i really wanted to delete my old messages because when i re-read them they seamed pointless.

Tony wrote:
> We listen.

Some things we do, some we don't.

We will not give
> the power to alter or delete messages.

At some stage we might
> introduce a confirmation screen, so that you can check your message
> before posting it.

that might work but it could get anoying

We listen.

Some things we do, some we don't.

We will not give the power to alter or delete messages.

At some stage we might introduce a confirmation screen, so that you can check your message before posting it.