The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I think the noteable idea is great but now there are 7 of them and I was wondering how many noteables there will be. It was a special thing with 5 and the same thing with 7 but surely it won't go up to 11 or12. When will the elections stop.
Page:
My guess is that by the time we get up to about 10 we will lose one every three months or so from the forums.
It's called "churn". So the level of active Notables will stay at between 5 and 8 I think, even if we elect a new one every three months.
It's called "churn". So the level of active Notables will stay at between 5 and 8 I think, even if we elect a new one every three months.
SHEEPY wrote:
> Whats a noteable?
Why did I write that??.............
> Whats a noteable?
Why did I write that??.............
New Jimmy wrote:
> I think the Notables have earned their places through consistent
> high quality, and humourous posts. Demotion would not be a good
> thing for the community atmosphere.
*************8
Yeah, but what you gonna do when we got to much Notables
> I think the Notables have earned their places through consistent
> high quality, and humourous posts. Demotion would not be a good
> thing for the community atmosphere.
*************8
Yeah, but what you gonna do when we got to much Notables
Whats a noteable?
PinkPig wrote:
> Well, there doesn't seem to be anything to stop more people becoming
> notables. One every three months means they will take time, but
> there could be loads.
Somebody had the idea that they could be
> demoted if they weren't any good any more.
Maybe after, say, two
> years, they must be re-elected if they wish to remain notables,
> giving a limit of 8 (provided only one is ever chosen)
******************
It was me, I said they should be elected. Say Grix hasnt been on for ages, like 4 months, then he should be elcted. But if he does come back he can still be voted for!
:)
> Well, there doesn't seem to be anything to stop more people becoming
> notables. One every three months means they will take time, but
> there could be loads.
Somebody had the idea that they could be
> demoted if they weren't any good any more.
Maybe after, say, two
> years, they must be re-elected if they wish to remain notables,
> giving a limit of 8 (provided only one is ever chosen)
******************
It was me, I said they should be elected. Say Grix hasnt been on for ages, like 4 months, then he should be elcted. But if he does come back he can still be voted for!
:)
Well, there doesn't seem to be anything to stop more people becoming notables. One every three months means they will take time, but there could be loads.
Somebody had the idea that they could be demoted if they weren't any good any more.
Maybe after, say, two years, they must be re-elected if they wish to remain notables, giving a limit of 8 (provided only one is ever chosen)
Somebody had the idea that they could be demoted if they weren't any good any more.
Maybe after, say, two years, they must be re-elected if they wish to remain notables, giving a limit of 8 (provided only one is ever chosen)
I think the noteable idea is great but now there are 7 of them and I was wondering how many noteables there will be. It was a special thing with 5 and the same thing with 7 but surely it won't go up to 11 or12. When will the elections stop.
Page: