The "PC Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This is disgusting: -
[URL]http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4696&[/URL]
So now there's the possibility of having to buy a crappy collectable card game to unlock items in the game?
I might love the game, but there's no way I'm that sad. If the game is unbalanced by this action, I'll be cancelling.
[URL]http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4696&[/URL]
So now there's the possibility of having to buy a crappy collectable card game to unlock items in the game?
I might love the game, but there's no way I'm that sad. If the game is unbalanced by this action, I'll be cancelling.
Page:
They've got it the wrong way round.
People who play WoW probably played Top Trumps when they were five and now they play new fangled computer games.
People who play WoW probably played Top Trumps when they were five and now they play new fangled computer games.
Damarus wrote:
>
> Clothes generally is armour. Theres maybe a few items you can wear as
> clothes that isn't armour in the entire game.
I think they'll be expanding the non-armour clothes with this promotion then, either that or you'll only get some of the lower types of armour in a different style/colour.
It might just turn-out to be different hats! :D
>
> Clothes generally is armour. Theres maybe a few items you can wear as
> clothes that isn't armour in the entire game.
I think they'll be expanding the non-armour clothes with this promotion then, either that or you'll only get some of the lower types of armour in a different style/colour.
It might just turn-out to be different hats! :D
The only form of clothing that doesn't affect your character in any way is a shirt.
It's almost always covered up by chest armor anyway.
Every other form of clothing is armor/stat-based.
It's almost always covered up by chest armor anyway.
Every other form of clothing is armor/stat-based.
Even boxers and socks? ;D
Hedfix wrote:
> Even boxers and socks? ;D
You can't remove avatar underwear. Thank god. I've seen far too many semi naked dancing orcs.
Before someone says "female night elf" I'd just like to point out that you're letching over a low poly computer character, most likely played at the other end by a bloke. Who's enjoying theattention. Probably in that way.
> Even boxers and socks? ;D
You can't remove avatar underwear. Thank god. I've seen far too many semi naked dancing orcs.
Before someone says "female night elf" I'd just like to point out that you're letching over a low poly computer character, most likely played at the other end by a bloke. Who's enjoying theattention. Probably in that way.
OddToe wrote:
> Spring 2006?
>
> I expect Blizzard are expecting half the people who have subscribed
> to have cancelled before then
I doubt they'll loose over a million customers before spring, especially not with an expansion already on the way.
This card deal is just another way to leech money of the hardcore few who spend every waking minute playing the game.
> Spring 2006?
>
> I expect Blizzard are expecting half the people who have subscribed
> to have cancelled before then
I doubt they'll loose over a million customers before spring, especially not with an expansion already on the way.
This card deal is just another way to leech money of the hardcore few who spend every waking minute playing the game.
Page: